State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jun;38(6):966-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.12.031.
To evaluate the agreement between optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) for biometry of the anterior segment.
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Evaluation of diagnostic technology.
A series of OLCR (Lenstar LS 900) and AS-OCT measurements of the anterior segment were taken for consecutive subjects aged 35 years and older in a population-based study. The differences and correlations between the 2 methods of ocular biometry were assessed. Agreement was calculated as the 95% limits of agreement (LoA).
The mean age of the 776 subjects was 55.2 years ± 12.0 (SD); 54.6% were women. The mean central corneal thickness (CCT) was smaller with OLCR than with AS-OCT (537.84 ± 31.46 μm versus 559.39 ± 32.02 μm) as was anterior chamber depth (ACD) (2.60 ± 0.37 mm versus 2.72 ± 0.37 mm) and anterior chamber width (ACW) (11.76 ± 0.47 mm versus 12.04 ± 0.55 mm) (all P<.001). The 95% LoA between the 2 instruments were -44.80 to 1.71 μm for CCT, -0.17 to -0.06 mm for ACD, and -1.28 to 0.72 mm for ACW.
Optical low-coherence reflectometry and AS-OCT yielded potentially interchangeable ACD measurements, while the CCT and ACW measurements acquired by the 2 devices showed clinically significant differences.
评估光学低相干反射计(OLCR)和眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)在前节生物测量中的一致性。
中山大学中山眼科中心眼科学国家重点实验室,中国广州。
诊断技术评估。
在一项基于人群的研究中,对连续的 35 岁及以上年龄的受试者进行了一系列 OLCR(Lenstar LS 900)和 AS-OCT 眼前节测量。评估了 2 种眼生物测量方法的差异和相关性。一致性以 95%的一致性界限(LoA)计算。
776 名受试者的平均年龄为 55.2 岁±12.0(标准差);54.6%为女性。中央角膜厚度(CCT)OLCR 测量值小于 AS-OCT(537.84±31.46μm 与 559.39±32.02μm),前房深度(ACD)(2.60±0.37mm 与 2.72±0.37mm)和前房宽度(ACW)(11.76±0.47mm 与 12.04±0.55mm)也较小(均 P<.001)。2 种仪器之间的 95%LoA 分别为 CCT 的-44.80 至 1.71μm、ACD 的-0.17 至-0.06mm 和 ACW 的-1.28 至 0.72mm。
OLCR 和 AS-OCT 可获得潜在可互换的 ACD 测量值,而 2 种设备获得的 CCT 和 ACW 测量值存在临床显著差异。