School of Health Science, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Blekinge, Sweden.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2012 Nov;12(6):356-60. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 May 23.
In Sweden, regulations from the National Agency for Higher Education advocate an education that equips students with independence as well as critical, problem-based thinking, i.e. academic literacy skills. However, some research findings indicate that students may leave higher education without mastering these skills effectively. As part of quality-assuring a nursing programme at a university college in south-east Sweden we explored the nursing student's view of crucial academic literacy skills, such as critical thinking and appraisal and academic writing, by conducting a descriptive, qualitative study. Informants were recruited through an advertisement posted on the university's e-learning tool. Eight focused interviews were conducted during autumn 2010. The transcribed interviews were analysed - inspired by content analysis - and two categories became apparent: constantly questioning and formality before substance. The latter revealed a gap between the student's perception of academic writing and that of the educators, thus implying that nursing students might not be equipped with the tools they need to develop within academia. We suggest that students could benefit in their academic endeavours from theoretical educational models that integrate several academic skills simultaneously and which could be incorporated into the development of syllabuses and curriculums.
在瑞典,国家高等教育署的规定提倡一种教育,使学生具备独立性以及批判性、基于问题的思维,即学术素养技能。然而,一些研究结果表明,学生可能离开高等教育时并没有有效地掌握这些技能。作为东南部瑞典一所大学护理课程质量保证的一部分,我们通过描述性、定性研究探讨了护理学生对批判性思维和评估以及学术写作等关键学术素养技能的看法。通过在大学的电子学习工具上发布广告来招募受访者。2010 年秋季进行了八次焦点访谈。对转录的访谈进行了分析——受到内容分析的启发——并出现了两个类别:不断质疑和形式重于实质。后者揭示了学生对学术写作的看法与教育者之间的差距,这意味着护理学生可能没有配备他们在学术界发展所需的工具。我们建议学生可以从同时整合多个学术技能的理论教育模式中受益,这些模式可以融入课程和课程的发展中。