Suppr超能文献

光照疗法作为一种附加治疗手段,用于治疗药物难治性癫痫。

Bright light therapy as an add on treatment for medically intractable epilepsy.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, Institute of Neurology, UCL, Queen Square, London, UK.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2012 Jul;24(3):359-64. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.04.123. Epub 2012 May 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bright light therapy (BLT) influences the regulation of melatonin and is an established treatment for seasonal affective disorder (SAD). This study was designed to examine the efficacy of BLT for seizure control in adults with focal epilepsy.

DESIGN

101 adults with medically intractable focal epilepsy were recruited to a parallel-design, double-blind, randomized trial of BLT as an add on treatment for epilepsy.

METHODS

All patients monitored their seizure frequency at home for a 12-week baseline period (September 2010 to December 2010). 51 of the participants were allocated with a high-intensity (HI) light box emitting 10,000 lx using an automated permuted block randomization grid. 50 were allocated with a cosmetically identical box emitting 2000 lx (low-intensity - LI), a subtherapeutic dose in other patient populations. Both groups were instructed to use their box for 20-30 min, upon waking every day for 12 weeks (January-March 2011). The primary outcome measure for the trial was seizure frequency.

RESULTS

77 participants (39 high-intensity/38 low-intensity) completed the trial and returned adequate data for analyses. Median reduction of seizures during the treatment phase was 1.5 in the LI group and 3 in the HI group (p>0.05). 6 patients (15%) in the high-intensity condition experienced an overall reduction of 50% or more in the frequency of complex partial seizures compared to 9 (24%) patients who used the low intensity light box. Response rates in the HI and LI treatment conditions were not significantly different (p>0.05). Patients with hippocampal sclerosis were more likely to respond to BLT at either intensity than patients with other focal epilepsies (risk ratio=1.7 95% CI lower limit=0.6, upper limit=4.6).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find a significant difference in the responder rates in the low- vs. high-intensity arms of the trial. Some patterns within the data suggest that BLT may warrant further investigation as a treatment for people with hippocampal pathology. Our initial findings suggest that caution should be exercised in using BLT in people with extra temporal focal epilepsy as it may result in an increase in seizures for some.

摘要

背景

亮光疗法(BLT)会影响褪黑素的调节,是治疗季节性情感障碍(SAD)的一种已确立的方法。本研究旨在检查 BLT 作为附加治疗方法对成人局灶性癫痫的控制效果。

设计

招募了 101 名患有医学上难治性局灶性癫痫的成年人,参加一项平行设计、双盲、随机试验,BLT 作为癫痫的附加治疗。

方法

所有患者在 12 周的基线期(2010 年 9 月至 2010 年 12 月)在家中监测自己的癫痫发作频率。其中 51 名参与者被分配到一个高强度(HI)光盒中,该光盒使用自动化随机排列网格发出 10,000 lx 的光。50 名参与者被分配到一个美容上相同的盒子中,该盒子发出 2000 lx(低强度 - LI)的光,这是其他患者群体中的亚治疗剂量。两组均被指示在每天醒来后使用盒子 20-30 分钟,持续 12 周(2011 年 1 月至 3 月)。试验的主要结局测量是癫痫发作频率。

结果

77 名参与者(39 名高强度/38 名低强度)完成了试验并返回了足够的分析数据。在治疗阶段,LI 组的癫痫发作中位数减少了 1.5 次,HI 组减少了 3 次(p>0.05)。与使用低强度光盒的 9 名(24%)患者相比,高强度条件下的 6 名(15%)患者的复杂部分性癫痫发作频率整体减少了 50%或更多。在 HI 和 LI 治疗条件下,反应率没有显著差异(p>0.05)。与其他局灶性癫痫相比,海马硬化患者对 BLT 的反应更可能(风险比=1.7,95%置信区间下限=0.6,上限=4.6)。

结论

我们没有发现试验中低强度与高强度臂之间的反应率有显著差异。数据中的一些模式表明,BLT 可能需要进一步研究作为海马病变患者的治疗方法。我们的初步发现表明,在颞叶外局灶性癫痫患者中使用 BLT 时应谨慎,因为它可能导致一些患者癫痫发作增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验