Department of Building and Construction, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Sep;48:167-84. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 May 28.
Since the safety professionals are the key decision makers dealing with project safety and risk assessment in the construction industry, their perceptions of safety risk would directly affect the reliability of risk assessment. The safety professionals generally tend to heavily rely on their own past experiences to make subjective decisions on risk assessment without systematic decision making. Indeed, understanding of the underlying principles of risk assessment is significant. In this study, the qualitative analysis on the safety professionals' beliefs of risk assessment and their perceptions towards risk assessment, including their recognitions of possible accident causes, the degree of differentiations on their perceptions of risk levels of different trades of works, recognitions of the occurrence of different types of accidents, and their inter-relationships with safety performance in terms of accident rates will be explored in the Stage 1. At the second stage, the deficiencies of the current general practice for risk assessment can be sorted out firstly. Based on the findings from Stage 1 and the historical accident data from 15 large-scaled construction projects in 3-year average, a risk evaluation model prioritizing the risk levels of different trades of works and which cause different types of site accident due to various accident causes will be developed quantitatively. With the suggested systematic accident recording techniques, this model can be implemented in the construction industry at both project level and organizational level. The model (Q(2)REM) not only act as a useful supplementary guideline of risk assessment for the construction safety professionals, but also assists them to pinpoint the potential risks on site for the construction workers under respective trades of works through safety trainings and education. It, in turn, arouses their awareness on safety risk. As the Q(2)REM can clearly show the potential accident causes leading to different types of accident by trade of works, it helps the concerned safety professionals and parties to plan effective accident prevention measures with reference to the priority of the risk levels.
由于安全专业人员是处理建筑行业项目安全和风险评估的关键决策者,他们对安全风险的看法将直接影响风险评估的可靠性。安全专业人员通常倾向于仅凭自己的过往经验对风险评估做出主观决策,而没有系统的决策方法。事实上,对风险评估基本原则的理解非常重要。在本研究中,将在第 1 阶段对安全专业人员对风险评估的信念和看法进行定性分析,包括他们对可能事故原因的认识、对不同工种风险水平的看法的区分程度、对不同类型事故发生的认识,以及他们对事故发生率的安全绩效的相互关系。在第 2 阶段,首先将梳理当前风险评估的一般做法中的不足之处。基于第 1 阶段的研究结果以及 15 个大型建筑项目在 3 年平均的历史事故数据,将开发一个定量的风险评估模型,该模型优先考虑不同工种的风险水平,并因各种事故原因导致不同类型的现场事故。通过建议的系统事故记录技术,该模型可以在项目级和组织级实施于建筑行业。该模型(Q(2)REM)不仅为建筑安全专业人员提供了有用的风险评估补充指南,还通过安全培训和教育帮助他们识别各工种现场的潜在风险。这反过来又引起了他们对安全风险的关注。由于 Q(2)REM 可以按工种清楚地显示导致不同类型事故的潜在事故原因,因此有助于相关安全专业人员和各方参考风险水平的优先级,制定有效的事故预防措施。