Botany Department, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e38073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038073. Epub 2012 May 30.
Parallel declines in insect-pollinated plants and their pollinators have been reported as a result of agricultural intensification. Intensive arable plant communities have previously been shown to contain higher proportions of self-pollinated plants compared to natural or semi-natural plant communities. Though intensive grasslands are widespread, it is not known whether they show similar patterns to arable systems nor whether local and/or landscape factors are influential. We investigated plant community composition in 10 pairs of organic and conventional dairy farms across Ireland in relation to the local and landscape context. Relationships between plant groups and local factors (farming system, position in field and soil parameters) and landscape factors (e.g. landscape complexity) were investigated. The percentage cover of unimproved grassland was used as an inverse predictor of landscape complexity, as it was negatively correlated with habitat-type diversity. Intensive grasslands (organic and conventional) contained more insect-pollinated forbs than non-insect pollinated forbs. Organic field centres contained more insect-pollinated forbs than conventional field centres. Insect-pollinated forb richness in field edges (but not field centres) increased with increasing landscape complexity (% unimproved grassland) within 1, 3, 4 and 5km radii around sites, whereas non-insect pollinated forb richness was unrelated to landscape complexity. Pollination systems within intensive grassland communities may be different from those in arable systems. Our results indicate that organic management increases plant richness in field centres, but that landscape complexity exerts strong influences in both organic and conventional field edges. Insect-pollinated forb richness, unlike that for non-insect pollinated forbs, showed positive relationships to landscape complexity reflecting what has been documented for bees and other pollinators. The insect-pollinated forbs, their pollinators and landscape context are clearly linked. This needs to be taken into account when managing and conserving insect-pollinated plant and pollinator communities.
由于农业集约化,授粉昆虫和授粉植物的数量呈平行下降趋势。与自然或半自然植物群落相比,先前的研究表明,集约化的耕地植物群落中具有更高比例的自花授粉植物。尽管密集型草原分布广泛,但尚不清楚它们是否表现出与耕地系统相似的模式,以及是否受到当地和/或景观因素的影响。我们调查了爱尔兰 10 对有机和常规奶牛场的植物群落组成与当地和景观背景的关系。研究了植物群与当地因素(农业系统、田间位置和土壤参数)和景观因素(如景观复杂性)之间的关系。未改良草地的盖度百分比被用作景观复杂性的逆预测指标,因为它与栖息地类型多样性呈负相关。密集型草地(有机和常规)的传粉昆虫授粉的草本植物比非传粉昆虫授粉的草本植物多。有机农田中心的传粉昆虫授粉的草本植物比常规农田中心的多。随着周围站点 1、3、4 和 5 公里半径范围内未改良草地的百分比增加,农田边缘(而非农田中心)的传粉昆虫授粉的草本植物丰富度增加,而无脊椎授粉的草本植物丰富度与景观复杂性无关。集约化草地群落中的传粉系统可能与耕地系统中的传粉系统不同。我们的研究结果表明,有机管理增加了农田中心的植物丰富度,但景观复杂性对有机和常规农田边缘都有很强的影响。传粉昆虫授粉的草本植物丰富度与非传粉昆虫授粉的草本植物不同,与景观复杂性呈正相关,这反映了蜜蜂和其他传粉者的研究结果。传粉昆虫授粉的草本植物、它们的传粉者和景观背景显然是相互联系的。在管理和保护传粉植物和传粉者群落时,需要考虑到这一点。