Suppr超能文献

系统评价员工工作时间控制与工作-非工作平衡、健康和幸福感以及与工作相关结果之间的关系。

Systematic review on the association between employee worktime control and work-non-work balance, health and well-being, and job-related outcomes.

机构信息

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9104, 6500 HE, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012 Jul;38(4):299-313. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3307. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess systematically the empirical evidence for associations between employee worktime control (WTC) and work-non-work balance, health/well-being, and job-related outcomes (eg, job satisfaction, job performance).

METHOD

A systematic search of empirical studies published between 1995-2011 resulted in 63 relevant papers from 53 studies. Five different categories of WTC measurements were distinguished (global WTC, multidimensional WTC, flextime, leave control, and "other subdimensions of WTC"). For each WTC category, we examined the strength of evidence for an association with (i) work-non-work balance, (ii) health/well-being, and (iii) job-related outcomes. We distinguished between cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention studies. Evidence strength was assessed based on the number of studies and their convergence in terms of study findings.

RESULTS

(Moderately) strong cross-sectional evidence was found for positive associations between global WTC and both work-non-work balance and job-related outcomes, whereas no consistent evidence was found regarding health/well-being. Intervention studies on global WTC found moderately strong evidence for a positive causal association with work-non-work balance and no or insufficient evidence for health/well-being and job-related outcomes. Limited to moderately strong cross-sectional evidence was found for positive associations between multidimensional WTC and our outcome categories. Moderately strong cross-sectional evidence was found for positive associations between flextime and all outcome categories. The lack of intervention or longitudinal studies restricts clear causal inferences.

CONCLUSIONS

This review has shown that there are theoretical and empirical reasons to view WTC as a promising tool for the maintenance of employees' work-non-work balance, health and well-being, and job-related outcomes. At the same time, however, the current state of evidence allows only very limited causal inferences to be made regarding the impact of enhanced WTC.

摘要

目的

本综述旨在系统评估员工工作时间控制(WTC)与工作-非工作平衡、健康/幸福和与工作相关的结果(如工作满意度、工作绩效)之间关联的实证证据。

方法

对 1995 年至 2011 年间发表的实证研究进行系统检索,从 53 项研究中得出 63 篇相关论文。区分了 WTC 测量的五个不同类别(整体 WTC、多维 WTC、弹性工作时间、休假控制和“WTC 的其他子维度”)。对于每个 WTC 类别,我们研究了与(i)工作-非工作平衡、(ii)健康/幸福和(iii)与工作相关的结果之间关联的证据强度。我们区分了横断面研究、纵向研究和干预研究。证据强度是基于研究数量和研究结果的一致性来评估的。

结果

(适度)有强有力的横断面证据表明,整体 WTC 与工作-非工作平衡和与工作相关的结果之间存在正相关,而在健康/幸福方面则没有一致的证据。关于整体 WTC 的干预研究发现,与工作-非工作平衡之间存在适度的正因果关联,而对健康/幸福和与工作相关的结果则没有或证据不足。有限的到适度强的横断面证据表明,多维 WTC 与我们的结果类别之间存在正相关。弹性工作时间与所有结果类别之间存在适度强的横断面证据。缺乏干预或纵向研究限制了明确的因果推断。

结论

本综述表明,有理论和实证理由将 WTC 视为维持员工工作-非工作平衡、健康和幸福以及与工作相关的结果的有前途的工具。然而,目前的证据状况仅允许对增强 WTC 的影响进行非常有限的因果推断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验