Suppr超能文献

右心室中隔的选择性部位起搏。导线性能及手术技术的随访。

Selective site pacing from the right ventricular mid-septum. Follow-up of lead performance and procedure technique.

作者信息

Yusu Satoru, Mera Hisaaki, Hoshida Kyoko, Miyakoshi Mutsumi, Miwa Yosuke, Tsukada Takehiro, Yoshino Hideaki, Ikeda Takanori

机构信息

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Int Heart J. 2012;53(2):113-6. doi: 10.1536/ihj.53.113.

Abstract

Pacing from the right ventricular (RV) apex is associated with adverse effects such as heart failure and atrial fibrillation. We attempted pacing from the RV mid-septum, which is theoretically a more physiological pacing site. A total of 172 consecutive patients with indications for permanent pacemaker implantation were studied. A screw-in lead and a curved stylet were used for lead positioning on the RV mid-septum. Pacemaker indices were evaluated at implantation and one year later. As an electrocardiographic parameter, QRS duration was measured in lead II. These data were compared to those of 66 patients subjected to conventional RV apical pacing. Lead placement was successful in all patients of RV mid-septal pacing. There were no technical problems during or after the procedure. The cumulative percentage of ventricular pacing at one year postimplantation was 85 ± 24 % in the SSP group. Sensing, pacing threshold, and lead impedance in the SSP group remained clinically stable over one year. When these measurements were compared between the SSP and AP groups, the pacing threshold and the lead impedance at one year postimplantation in the SSP group were higher (P < 0.05) and lower (P < 0.01), respectively, than those of the AP group. The mean QRS duration was markedly shorter (123 ± 16 versus 150 ± 18 msec, P < 0.0001). Selective site pacing from the RV mid-septum is feasible and results in less conduction delay compared to conventional RV apical pacing, and its procedure seems to be more physiological in permanent pacemaker implantation.

摘要

右心室心尖部起搏与心力衰竭和心房颤动等不良反应相关。我们尝试从右心室中隔部起搏,理论上这是一个更符合生理的起搏部位。对总共172例有永久性起搏器植入指征的连续患者进行了研究。使用螺旋电极和弯曲的塑形钢丝将电极定位在右心室中隔部。在植入时和一年后评估起搏器参数。作为心电图参数,在II导联测量QRS时限。将这些数据与66例接受传统右心室心尖部起搏的患者的数据进行比较。所有右心室中隔部起搏的患者电极放置均成功。手术期间及术后均无技术问题。植入后一年,SSP组心室起搏的累积百分比为85±24%。SSP组的感知、起搏阈值和电极阻抗在一年中保持临床稳定。当在SSP组和AP组之间比较这些测量值时,SSP组植入后一年的起搏阈值较高(P<0.05),电极阻抗较低(P<0.01),均分别高于AP组。平均QRS时限明显更短(123±16对150±18毫秒,P<0.0001)。与传统右心室心尖部起搏相比,从右心室中隔部进行选择性部位起搏是可行的,并且传导延迟更少,其操作在永久性起搏器植入中似乎更符合生理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验