• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2011 年 7 月 22 日挪威发生的两次恐怖袭击事件:创伤中心的应对措施。

The twin terrorist attacks in Norway on July 22, 2011: the trauma center response.

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Ulleval, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jul;73(1):269-75. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825a787f.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e31825a787f
PMID:22743394
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The terrorist attacks in Norway on July 22, 2011, consisted of a bomb explosion in central Oslo, followed by a shooting spree in a youth camp. We describe the trauma center response, identifying possible success factors and suggesting improvements for institutional major incident plans.

METHODS

The in-hospital response is analyzed. Data on triage, patient flow, injuries, treatment, resources, and outcome were collected.

RESULTS

The explosion caused a total of 98 casualties and 8 died at scene. Ten patients were triaged to the trauma center, with the first patient arriving 18 minutes after the explosion and 7 patients within the next 19 minutes. The shooting caused 68 deaths at the scene and 61 injured. The trauma center received a total of 21 patients from the shooting incident.Surgical leadership was divided between emergency department triage with control of personnel and communication as well as control and supervision of treatment with retriage and optimal use of trauma surgical resources (dual command). Surge capacity was never exceeded in the emergency department, operating rooms, or intensive care units.Of the 31 patients treated at the trauma center, 20 had an Injury Severity Score of more than 15 and 25 required repeated operation, for a total of 125 operations during the first 4 weeks. One patient died, for a critical mortality of 5%.

CONCLUSION

A trauma center can handle many patients with severe injury, with low critical mortality when protected from a large number of walking wounded. Limited specific trauma surgical competence was managed by the adoption of a dual surgical command model.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management study, level V.

摘要

背景

2011 年 7 月 22 日,挪威发生恐怖袭击,奥斯陆市中心发生爆炸,随后在青年营发生枪击事件。我们描述了创伤中心的应对措施,确定了可能的成功因素,并为机构重大事件计划提出了改进建议。

方法

分析院内应对措施。收集了分诊、患者流程、损伤、治疗、资源和结局的数据。

结果

爆炸造成 98 人伤亡,8 人当场死亡。10 名患者被分诊至创伤中心,第一名患者在爆炸后 18 分钟到达,7 名患者在随后的 19 分钟内到达。枪击事件造成现场 68 人死亡,61 人受伤。创伤中心共收治枪击事件 21 名患者。急诊分诊的紧急医疗部门负责人负责人员和沟通的控制,以及治疗的控制和监督,进行再次分诊和优化创伤外科资源的利用(双重指挥)。在急诊室、手术室或重症监护病房,从未出现过能力过剩的情况。在创伤中心接受治疗的 31 名患者中,20 名患者的损伤严重程度评分超过 15 分,25 名患者需要再次手术,在最初的 4 周内共进行了 125 次手术。1 名患者死亡,死亡率为 5%。

结论

当受到大量流动伤员的影响时,创伤中心可以处理大量严重受伤的患者,其关键死亡率较低。采用双重手术指挥模式,可以管理有限的特定创伤外科能力。

证据水平

治疗/护理管理研究,等级 V。

相似文献

1
The twin terrorist attacks in Norway on July 22, 2011: the trauma center response.2011 年 7 月 22 日挪威发生的两次恐怖袭击事件:创伤中心的应对措施。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jul;73(1):269-75. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825a787f.
2
Rural hospital mass casualty response to a terrorist shooting spree.农村医院对恐怖分子枪击事件的大规模应急反应。
Br J Surg. 2013 Aug;100(9):1198-204. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9203.
3
Radiology response in the emergency department during a mass casualty incident: a retrospective study of the two terrorist attacks on 22 July 2011 in Norway.大规模伤亡事件中急诊科的放射学反应:对2011年7月22日挪威两次恐怖袭击事件的回顾性研究
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):2828-2834. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4677-8. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
4
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.
5
A descriptive analysis of injury triage, surge of medical demand, and resource use in an university hospital after 8.12 Tianjin Port Explosion, China.中国天津港8·12爆炸事件后某大学医院的伤情分诊、医疗需求激增及资源使用情况的描述性分析
Chin J Traumatol. 2015;18(6):314-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.11.012.
6
Mass casualty management after a suicidal terrorist attack on a religious procession in Quetta, Pakistan.巴基斯坦奎达一场针对宗教游行的自杀式恐怖袭击后的大规模伤亡管理。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006 Apr;16(4):253-6.
7
Injuries caused by fragmenting rifle ammunition.步枪子弹碎片造成的伤害。
Injury. 2016 Sep;47(9):1951-4. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.023. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
8
Gunshot wounds and blast injuries to the face are associated with significant morbidity and mortality: results of an 11-year multi-institutional study of 720 patients.枪伤和面部爆炸伤与显著的发病率和死亡率相关:一项涉及 720 例患者的 11 年多机构研究结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):347-52. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aaa5b8.
9
11 March 2004: The terrorist bomb explosions in Madrid, Spain--an analysis of the logistics, injuries sustained and clinical management of casualties treated at the closest hospital.2004年3月11日:西班牙马德里恐怖炸弹爆炸事件——对后勤情况、人员受伤情况以及在最近医院接受治疗的伤员临床处理情况的分析
Crit Care. 2005 Feb;9(1):104-11. doi: 10.1186/cc2995. Epub 2004 Nov 3.
10
The mortality benefit of direct trauma center transport in a regional trauma system: a population-based analysis.区域创伤系统中直接创伤中心转运的生存获益:一项基于人群的分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1510-5; discussion 1515-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318252510a.

引用本文的文献

1
A full response chain surge capacity test of a small rural hospital, prehospital resources and collaborating organisations.一家小型农村医院、院前资源及合作组织的全响应链应急能力测试。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Mar 28;33(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01372-9.
2
A systematic review of hemorrhage and vascular injuries in civilian public mass shootings.平民公共大规模枪击事件中的出血和血管损伤的系统评价。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 19;31(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01093-x.
3
When disaster strikes: staff recall and the use of staff recall systems during mass patient influx at Norwegian emergency primary health care centers - a cross-sectional study.
灾难来袭时:挪威应急初级保健中心大量患者涌入期间工作人员的回忆和工作人员召回系统的使用——一项横断面研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00802-0.
4
Characteristics of Electric Scooter and Bicycle Injuries After Introduction of Electric Scooter Rentals in Oslo, Norway.挪威奥斯陆引入电动滑板车租赁后,电动滑板车和自行车事故的特点。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2226701. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26701.
5
Insomnia in survivors 8.5 years after the Utøya Island terrorist attack: transition from late adolescence to early adulthood - the Utøya study.乌托亚岛恐怖袭击 8.5 年后幸存者的失眠症:从青春期后期到成年早期的过渡 - 乌托亚研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Jan 26;13(1):2020472. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.2020472. eCollection 2022.
6
Lessons learned from terror attacks: thematic priorities and development since 2001-results from a systematic review.从恐怖袭击中吸取的教训:2001 年以来的主题优先事项和发展——系统评价的结果。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):2613-2638. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01858-y. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
7
Disaster preparedness should represent an augmentation of the everyday trauma system, but are we prepared?灾难准备应是日常创伤系统的强化,但我们做好准备了吗?
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Jul 7;6(1):e000760. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000760. eCollection 2021.
8
Explosion fatalities in Sweden, 2000-2018.2000-2018 年瑞典爆炸死亡事件。
Med Sci Law. 2022 Apr;62(2):88-94. doi: 10.1177/00258024211025228. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
9
Prehospital Tourniquets in Civilians: A Systematic Review.院前止血带在平民中的应用:系统评价。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021 Feb;36(1):86-94. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X20001284. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
10
Analysis of the medical response to November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks: resource utilization according to the cause of injury.分析 2015 年 11 月巴黎恐怖袭击的医疗应对措施:根据受伤原因分析资源利用情况。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Sep;45(9):1231-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05724-9. Epub 2019 Aug 15.