Kim Dae Shik, Emerson Robert Wall, Naghshineh Koorosh, Pliskow Jay, Myers Kyle
Western Michigan University, Department of Blindness and Low Vision Studies, 1903 W Michigan Ave, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5218, USA.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(3):381-93. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.03.0041.
A repeated-measures design with block randomization was used for the study, in which 14 adults with visual impairments attempted to detect three different vehicles: a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) with an artificially generated sound (Vehicle Sound for Pedestrians [VSP]), an HEV without the VSP, and a comparable internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle. The VSP vehicle (mean +/- standard deviation [SD] = 38.3 +/- 14.8 m) was detected at a significantly farther distance than the HEV (mean +/- SD = 27.5 +/- 11.5 m), t = 4.823, p < 0.001, but no significant difference existed between the VSP and ICE vehicles (mean +/- SD = 34.5 +/- 14.3 m), t = 1.787, p = 0.10. Despite the overall sound level difference between the two test sites (parking lot = 48.7 dBA, roadway = 55.1 dBA), no significant difference in detection distance between the test sites was observed, F(1, 13) = 0.025, p = 0.88. No significant interaction was found between the vehicle type and test site, F(1.31, 16.98) = 0.272, p = 0.67. The findings of the study may help us understand how adding an artificially generated sound to an HEV could affect some of the orientation and mobility tasks performed by blind pedestrians.
本研究采用了区组随机化的重复测量设计,14名视力障碍成年人尝试检测三种不同的车辆:一辆带有人工生成声音(行人车辆声音[VSP])的混合动力电动汽车(HEV)、一辆没有VSP的HEV以及一辆类似的内燃机(ICE)车辆。检测到VSP车辆(平均值±标准差[SD]=38.3±14.8米)的距离显著远于HEV(平均值±SD=27.5±11.5米),t=4.823,p<0.001,但VSP车辆和ICE车辆(平均值±SD=34.5±14.3米)之间没有显著差异,t=1.787,p=0.10。尽管两个测试地点的总体声级存在差异(停车场=48.7分贝,道路=55.1分贝),但未观察到测试地点之间在检测距离上有显著差异,F(1, 13)=0.025,p=0.88。未发现车辆类型和测试地点之间存在显著交互作用,F(1.31, 16.98)=0.272,p=0.67。该研究结果可能有助于我们了解给HEV添加人工生成的声音如何影响盲人行人执行的一些定向和移动任务。