Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Aug;37(4):283-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2012.02526.x.
To evaluate the treatment effect of prednisolone and/or valaciclovir in Bell's palsy patients with different baseline severity of palsy.
Patient data were collected from the Scandinavian Bell's Palsy Study, a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial.
Sixteen otorhinolaryngological centres in Sweden and one in Finland.
Altogether, 829 patients aged 18-75 years were treated within 72 h of palsy onset. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with prednisolone plus placebo (n = 210), valaciclovir plus placebo (n = 207), prednisolone plus valaciclovir (n = 206), placebo plus placebo (n = 206). Follow-up was 12 months.
Facial function was assessed using the Sunnybrook grading scale at baseline and at 12 months. Complete recovery was defined as Sunnybrook score = 100.
All patients, regardless of baseline severity, showed significantly higher complete recovery rates if treated with prednisolone compared with no prednisolone. In patients with severe palsy, recovery at 12 months was 51% with prednisolone treatment versus 31% without prednisolone (P = 0.02). Corresponding results were 68%versus 51% (P = 0.004) for moderate, and 83%versus 73% (P = 0.02) for mild palsy. In patient groups with moderate and mild palsy at baseline, significantly fewer prednisolone-treated patients had synkinesis at 12 months (P = 0.04 and P < 0.0001, respectively). For patients with severe palsy at baseline, prednisolone versus no prednisolone made no significant difference regarding synkinesis at 12 months. Valaciclovir did not add any significant effect to prednisolone regarding recovery rate or synkinesis at 12 months.
Prednisolone treatment resulted in higher complete recovery rates, regardless of severity at baseline. Prednisolone treatment should be considered in all patients irrespective of degree of palsy.
评估不同基线面瘫严重程度的贝尔麻痹患者使用泼尼松龙和/或伐昔洛韦的治疗效果。
患者数据来自斯堪的纳维亚贝尔麻痹研究,这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心试验。
瑞典的 16 个耳鼻喉科中心和芬兰的 1 个中心。
总共 829 名年龄在 18-75 岁之间的患者在面瘫发作后 72 小时内接受治疗。患者被随机分配接受泼尼松龙加安慰剂(n = 210)、伐昔洛韦加安慰剂(n = 207)、泼尼松龙加伐昔洛韦(n = 206)、安慰剂加安慰剂(n = 206)治疗。随访 12 个月。
基线和 12 个月时使用桑尼布鲁克分级量表评估面部功能。完全恢复定义为桑尼布鲁克评分=100。
所有患者,无论基线严重程度如何,与未用泼尼松龙治疗相比,使用泼尼松龙治疗的完全恢复率均显著提高。在面瘫严重的患者中,泼尼松龙治疗 12 个月的恢复率为 51%,而未用泼尼松龙治疗的恢复率为 31%(P = 0.02)。中度面瘫患者的相应结果为 68%对 51%(P = 0.004),轻度面瘫患者为 83%对 73%(P = 0.02)。在基线时为中度和轻度面瘫的患者组中,泼尼松龙治疗的患者在 12 个月时发生联动的比例显著降低(P = 0.04 和 P < 0.0001)。对于基线时面瘫严重的患者,泼尼松龙与不用泼尼松龙治疗在 12 个月时的联动发生率无显著差异。伐昔洛韦在恢复率或 12 个月时的联动方面对泼尼松龙无显著附加作用。
泼尼松龙治疗无论基线严重程度如何,均可提高完全恢复率。泼尼松龙治疗应考虑用于所有患者,而与面瘫程度无关。