Suppr超能文献

[经左胸与右胸开胸进行淋巴结清扫的结果比较]

[Comparison of the results of lymph node dissection via left versus right thoracotomy].

作者信息

Mao You-sheng, He Jie, Dong Jing-si, Cheng Gui-yu, Sun Ke-lin, Liu Xiang-yang, Fang De-kang, Li Jian, Wang Yong-gang

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;34(4):296-300. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2012.04.013.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Up to now surgical treatment has been still the most effective treatment for esophageal cancer. However, postoperative lymph node recurrence is still a frequent event and affects long term survival considerably. The aim of this study is to compare the results of lymph node dissection via left vs. right thoracotomies and to verify whether there is any essential difference in lymphadenectomy between these two approaches.

METHODS

Five hundred and fifty-nine cases with thoracic esophageal cancer were randomly selected from the database of esophageal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital between May 2005 and January 2011, including 282 cases through left thoracotomy and 277 cases through right thoracotomy. This series consisted of 449 males and 110 females with a mean age of 58.8 years (age range: 36 - 78 years). The pathological types were mainly squamous cell carcinoma (548 cases) and other rare types (11 cases). The data were analyzed and compared using Chi-square test. The P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The actual 5-year survival rate was calculated based on the recent follow-up data of the patients who underwent surgery at least 5 years ago.

RESULTS

The average number of dissected lymph nodes was 23.4 via left versus 24.6 via right thoracotomies. The overall lymph node metastasis rate was 48.9% via left thoracotomy and 53.8% via right thoracotomy, and 34.8% vs. 50.5% in the chest (P < 0.001), 29.1% vs. 17.7% in the abdomen (P = 0.001). The pathologically confirmed lymph node metastasis rate was 45.9%, 44.0% and 34.9% in the upper, middle and lower segments of thoracic esophagus, respectively. The lymph node metastasis rates detected via left and right thoracotomy in the stage T1 cases were 14.7% (5/34) vs. 42.9% (12/28) (P < 0.001), and in the stage T2 cases were 35.4% (17/48) vs. 52.8% (28/53) (P = 0.007); in the station of para-thoracic esophagus were 9.6% vs. 13.4%, in the left upper mediastinum were 2.1% vs. 7.6%, and in the right upper mediastinum were 1.4% vs. 26.0%, respectively. The preliminary actual 5-year survival rate was 38.2% in the cases via left thoracotomy vs. 42.1% in those via right thoracotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that lymph node dissection is more complete via right thoracotomy than via left thoracotomy, especially for the tracheoesophageal groove and para-recurrent laryngeal nerve nodes, which may eventually improve the survival of patients with esophageal cancer. Therefore, surgical treatment via right thoracotomy by Ivor-Lewis (two incisions) mode or Levis-Tanner (three incisions) mode with two-field or three-field complete lymph node dissection may become prevalent in the future.

摘要

目的

迄今为止,手术治疗仍是食管癌最有效的治疗方法。然而,术后淋巴结复发仍然是常见事件,并且对长期生存有相当大的影响。本研究的目的是比较经左胸与经右胸进行淋巴结清扫的结果,并验证这两种方法在淋巴结切除方面是否存在本质差异。

方法

从2005年5月至2011年1月在我院接受手术治疗的食管癌患者数据库中随机选取559例胸段食管癌病例,其中经左胸手术282例,经右胸手术277例。该系列包括449例男性和110例女性,平均年龄58.8岁(年龄范围:36 - 78岁)。病理类型主要为鳞状细胞癌(548例)和其他罕见类型(11例)。采用卡方检验对数据进行分析和比较。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。根据至少5年前接受手术患者的近期随访数据计算实际5年生存率。

结果

经左胸清扫的淋巴结平均数量为23.4个,经右胸为24.6个。经左胸手术的总体淋巴结转移率为48.9%,经右胸为53.8%,胸部淋巴结转移率分别为34.8%和50.5%(P < 0.001),腹部为29.1%和17.7%(P = 0.001)。胸段食管上段、中段和下段经病理证实的淋巴结转移率分别为45.9%、44.0%和34.9%。T1期病例经左胸和右胸手术检测到的淋巴结转移率分别为14.7%(5/34)和42.9%(12/28)(P < 0.001),T2期病例分别为35.4%(17/48)和52.8%(28/53)(P = 0.007);胸段食管旁淋巴结转移率分别为9.6%和13.4%,左上纵隔分别为2.1%和7.6%,右上纵隔分别为1.4%和26.0%。经左胸手术病例的初步实际5年生存率为38.2%,经右胸手术病例为42.1%。

结论

本研究结果表明,经右胸进行淋巴结清扫比经左胸更彻底,尤其是对于气管食管沟和喉返神经旁淋巴结,这可能最终提高食管癌患者的生存率。因此,采用Ivor-Lewis(两切口)术式或Levis-Tanner(三切口)术式经右胸进行两野或三野完整淋巴结清扫的手术治疗可能在未来变得普遍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验