Emory Prevention Research Center, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Sep-Oct;18(5):431-9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31822d4c69.
To describe a project that used mini-grants plus technical assistance to disseminate evidence-based programs, to understand how the project worked in different settings, and to generate recommendations for future programming and evaluation.
Process evaluation using program records, activity forms completed by grantees, interviews, and focus groups.
Churches and worksites in rural, southwest Georgia.
Site coordinators (n = 10), organizational leaders (n = 7), and project committee members (n = 25) involved in program implementation at 7 funded organizations.
The Emory Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network solicited applications from churches and worksites to implement one of 2 evidence-based nutrition programs: Body & Soul for churches and Treatwell 5-a-Day for worksites. Successful applicants (n = 7) received funding and technical assistance from Emory and agreed to conduct all required elements of the evidence-based program.
We assessed adoption, reach, implementation, and maintenance of specific programs and their core elements, as well as contextual influences and the resources required to implement the mini-grants program.
Four of the 7 funded organizations conducted all programmatic core elements; all 7 sites conducted at least 6 of 8 core elements, including at least 1 food-related policy or environmental change as a result of the program. Program reach varied widely across sites and core elements. All site coordinators stated that they intend to continue at least some of the activities conducted under the project. Sites reported that contextual factors such as the program's fit with the organization's mission, leadership support, and leadership or staffing transitions influenced program implementation. Over 18 months, Emory staff spent 47.7 hours providing technical assistance to grantees.
A mini-grants and technical assistance model has the potential to be an effective mechanism for disseminating evidence-based programs to community organizations, and further study of this method is warranted.
描述一个使用小额赠款加技术援助来传播循证项目的项目,了解该项目在不同环境中的运作方式,并为未来的规划和评估提出建议。
使用项目记录、受赠者填写的活动表、访谈和焦点小组进行的过程评估。
乔治亚州西南部农村的教堂和工作场所。
参与 7 个资助组织项目实施的项目协调员(n = 10)、组织领导(n = 7)和项目委员会成员(n = 25)。
埃默里癌症预防和控制研究网络向教堂和工作场所征集申请,以实施 2 项基于证据的营养计划之一:教堂的 Body & Soul 和工作场所的 Treatwell 5-a-Day。成功的申请者(n = 7)从埃默里获得资金和技术援助,并同意实施基于证据的计划的所有必要要素。
我们评估了特定计划及其核心要素的采用、覆盖范围、实施和维护,以及实施小额赠款计划所需的背景影响和资源。
7 个资助组织中有 4 个组织开展了所有项目的核心要素;所有 7 个地点都开展了 8 个核心要素中的至少 6 个,包括至少 1 项与食品相关的政策或环境变化,这是该项目的结果。项目的覆盖范围在各地点和核心要素之间差异很大。所有的项目协调员都表示,他们打算继续进行项目下开展的至少部分活动。各地点报告称,计划与组织使命的契合度、领导支持以及领导层或人员变动等背景因素影响了项目的实施。在 18 个月的时间里,埃默里的工作人员为受赠者提供了 47.7 小时的技术援助。
小额赠款和技术援助模式有可能成为向社区组织传播循证项目的有效机制,需要进一步研究这种方法。