Ryu Gyeong Suk, Lee Yu Jeung
Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul, South Korea.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(6):439-45. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.6.439.
Patients use several types of devices to measure liquid medication. Using a criterion ranging from a 10% to 40% variation from a target 5 mL for a teaspoon dose, previous studies have found that a considerable proportion of patients or caregivers make errors when dosing liquid medication with measuring devices.
To determine the rate and magnitude of liquid medication dose errors that occur with patient/caregiver use of various measuring devices in a community pharmacy.
Liquid medication measurements by patients or caregivers were observed in a convenience sample of community pharmacy patrons in Korea during a 2-week period in March 2011. Participants included all patients or caregivers (N = 300) who came to the pharmacy to buy over-the-counter liquid medication or to have a liquid medication prescription filled during the study period. The participants were instructed by an investigator who was also a pharmacist to select their preferred measuring devices from 6 alternatives (etched-calibration dosing cup, printed-calibration dosing cup, dosing spoon, syringe, dispensing bottle, or spoon with a bottle adapter) and measure a 5 mL dose of Coben (chlorpheniramine maleate/phenylephrine HCl, Daewoo Pharm. Co., Ltd) syrup using the device of their choice. The investigator used an ISOLAB graduated cylinder (Germany, blue grad, 10 mL) to measure the amount of syrup dispensed by the study participants. Participant characteristics were recorded including gender, age, education level, and relationship to the person for whom the medication was intended.
Of the 300 participants, 257 (85.7%) were female; 286 (95.3%) had at least a high school education; and 282 (94.0%) were caregivers (parent or grandparent) for the patient. The mean (SD) measured dose was 4.949 (0.378) mL for the 300 participants. In analysis of variance of the 6 measuring devices, the greatest difference from the 5 mL target was a mean 5.552 mL for 17 subjects who used the regular (etched) dosing cup and 4.660 mL for the dosing spoon (n = 10; P < 0.001). Doses were within 10% of the 5 mL target volume for 88.7% (n = 266) of the participant samples. Only 34 cases (11.3%) had dose errors greater than 10%, and only 6 cases (2.0%) had a variance of more than 20% from the 5 mL target volume. Dose errors greater than 10% of the target volume were more common for the etched dosing cup (47.1%, n = 8), the dosing spoon (50.0%, n = 5), and the printed dosing cup (30.8%, n = 4), but these 3 devices were used by only 13.3% of the study participants.
Approximately 1 in 10 participants measured doses of liquid medication with a volume error greater than 10%, and these dose errors were more common with the etched dosing cup, the dosing spoon, and the printed dosing cup. Pharmacists have an opportunity to counsel patients or caregivers regarding the appropriate use of measuring devices for liquid medication.
患者使用多种类型的设备来测量液体药物剂量。以往研究采用茶匙剂量与目标5毫升之间10%至40%的偏差范围作为标准,发现相当一部分患者或护理人员在使用测量设备给液体药物给药时会出现错误。
确定社区药房中患者/护理人员使用各种测量设备时发生液体药物剂量错误的发生率和程度。
2011年3月的两周时间里,在韩国社区药房顾客的便利样本中观察患者或护理人员对液体药物的测量情况。参与者包括在研究期间前来药房购买非处方液体药物或开具液体药物处方的所有患者或护理人员(N = 300)。一名也是药剂师的研究者指导参与者从6种备选设备(蚀刻校准量杯、印刷校准量杯、药匙、注射器、配药瓶或带瓶适配器的药匙)中选择他们喜欢的测量设备,并使用所选设备测量5毫升的科本(马来酸氯苯那敏/盐酸去氧肾上腺素,大宇制药有限公司)糖浆剂量。研究者使用ISOLAB量筒(德国,蓝色刻度,10毫升)测量研究参与者所分配的糖浆量。记录参与者的特征,包括性别、年龄、教育水平以及与用药对象的关系。
300名参与者中,257名(85.7%)为女性;286名(95.3%)至少受过高中教育;282名(94.0%)是患者的护理人员(父母或祖父母)。300名参与者的平均(标准差)测量剂量为4.949(0.378)毫升。在对6种测量设备的方差分析中,与5毫升目标值差异最大的是17名使用普通(蚀刻)量杯的受试者的平均5.552毫升,药匙为4.660毫升(n = 10;P < 0.001)。88.7%(n = 266)的参与者样本剂量在5毫升目标体积的10%以内。只有34例(11.3%)剂量误差大于10%,只有6例(2.0%)与从5毫升目标体积的偏差超过20%。目标体积10%以上的剂量误差在蚀刻量杯(47.1%,n = 8)、药匙(50.0%,n = 5)和印刷量杯(30.8%,n = 4)中更常见,但这3种设备仅被13.3%的研究参与者使用。
大约十分之一的参与者测量的液体药物剂量体积误差大于10%,这些剂量误差在蚀刻量杯、药匙和印刷量杯中更常见。药剂师有机会就液体药物测量设备的正确使用向患者或护理人员提供咨询。