Department of Anesthesiology, Yuan's General Hospital, No. 162, Cheng-Kung 1st Road, Kaohsiung City 80249, Taiwan.
Vet J. 2013 Feb;195(2):254-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
Efficient oral endotracheal intubation of laboratory animals is a challenging technique in veterinary research. This study introduces a miniaturized lighted stylet for rabbit intubation. An experiment with repeated measures on two factors was used to assess the feasibility and efficacy of this method. The first factor compared stylet intubation vs. laryngoscopic intubation. The second compared three practitioners, one with prior experience and two without. Success rates on the initial attempt were not statistically different (χ(2)=2.46, P=0.12). The time difference between methods was significant (F=41.007, P<0.001), although the effect of practitioners was not (F=1.038, P=0.365). The mean±SD of the intubation time, combining results from the three practitioners, was 20.34±17.15s for the stylet method and 57.58±64.21s for the laryngoscopic method. The results of this study demonstrate that lighted stylet intubation is efficient, robust, and independent of practitioner experience.
高效的口腔气管内插管术是兽医研究中的一项具有挑战性的技术。本研究介绍了一种用于兔插管的微型光引导插管器。采用两因素重复测量实验来评估该方法的可行性和效果。第一个因素比较了插管器插管与喉镜插管。第二个因素比较了三位操作者,其中一位有经验,另外两位没有经验。首次尝试的成功率没有统计学差异(χ(2)=2.46,P=0.12)。两种方法之间的时间差异有统计学意义(F=41.007,P<0.001),尽管操作者的效果没有统计学意义(F=1.038,P=0.365)。结合三位操作者的结果,插管器法的平均±SD 插管时间为 20.34±17.15s,喉镜法的平均±SD 插管时间为 57.58±64.21s。本研究结果表明,光引导插管器插管术高效、稳健,且不依赖于操作者的经验。