Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Jul;9(7):2293-311. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9072293. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
Public health emergency planners can better perform their mission if they develop and maintain effective relationships with community- and faith-based organizations in their jurisdictions. This qualitative study presents six themes that emerged from 20 key informant interviews representing a wide range of American community- and faith-based organizations across different types of jurisdictions, organizational types, and missions. This research seeks to provide local health department public health emergency planners with tools to assess and improve their inter-organizational community relationships. The themes identified address the importance of community engagement, leadership, intergroup dynamics and communication, and resources. Community- and faith-based organizations perceive that they are underutilized or untapped resources with respect to public health emergencies and disasters. One key reason for this is that many public health departments limit their engagement with community- and faith-based organizations to a one-way "push" model for information dissemination, rather than engaging them in other ways or improving their capacity. Beyond a reprioritization of staff time, few other resources would be required. From the perspective of community- and faith-based organizations, the quality of relationships seems to matter more than discrete resources provided by such ties.
公共卫生应急规划者如果能在其管辖范围内与社区和信仰组织建立并维持有效的关系,就能更好地履行其使命。本定性研究提出了 20 名关键知情者访谈中出现的六个主题,这些访谈代表了美国不同类型司法管辖区、组织类型和任务的广泛社区和信仰组织。本研究旨在为地方卫生部门的公共卫生应急规划者提供评估和改善其组织间社区关系的工具。确定的主题涉及社区参与、领导力、群体间动态和沟通以及资源的重要性。社区和信仰组织认为,就公共卫生突发事件和灾害而言,它们是未被充分利用或挖掘的资源。造成这种情况的一个主要原因是,许多公共卫生部门将与社区和信仰组织的接触仅限于单向“推送”模式的信息传播,而不是以其他方式与他们接触或提高他们的能力。除了重新优先考虑员工时间之外,几乎不需要其他资源。从社区和信仰组织的角度来看,关系的质量似乎比这些关系提供的离散资源更为重要。