Centre for Research Excellence in Patient Safety, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Prahran Victoria, Australia.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):483-94. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs044. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
The objective of this review was to critically appraise the literature relating to associations between high-level structural and operational hospital characteristics and improved performance.
The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, proQuest and PsychINFO were searched for articles published between January 1996 and May 2010. Reference lists of included articles were reviewed and key journals were hand searched for relevant articles.
and data extraction Studies were included if they were systematic reviews or meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, controlled before and after studies or observational studies (cohort and cross-sectional) that were multicentre, comparative performance studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data, assigned grades of evidence according to the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines and critically appraised the included articles. Data synthesis Fifty-seven studies were reported within 12 systematic reviews and 47 observational articles. There was heterogeneity in use and definition of performance outcomes. Hospital characteristics investigated were environment (incentives, market characteristics), structure (network membership, ownership, teaching status, geographical setting, service size) and operational design (innovativeness, leadership, organizational culture, public reporting and patient safety practices, information technology systems and decision support, service activity and planning, workforce design, staff training and education). The strongest evidence for an association with overall performance was identified for computerized physician order entry systems. Some evidence supported the associations with workforce design, use of financial incentives, nursing leadership and hospital volume.
There is limited, mainly low-quality evidence, supporting the associations between hospital characteristics and healthcare performance. Further characteristic-specific systematic reviews are indicated.
本次综述的目的是批判性地评价与高水平结构和运营医院特征与改善绩效之间关联的文献。
Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE(Ovid)、CINAHL、ProQuest 和 PsychINFO 均检索了 1996 年 1 月至 2010 年 5 月期间发表的文章。对纳入文章的参考文献进行了综述,并对重点期刊进行了手工检索以获取相关文章。
如果是系统评价或荟萃分析、随机对照试验、对照前后研究或观察性研究(队列和横断面),且为多中心、比较绩效研究,则纳入研究。两名评审员独立提取数据,根据澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会指南对证据等级进行赋值,并对纳入的文章进行批判性评价。
12 篇系统评价和 47 篇观察性文章报告了 57 项研究。绩效结果的使用和定义存在异质性。研究调查的医院特征包括环境(激励措施、市场特征)、结构(网络成员、所有权、教学地位、地理位置、服务规模)和运营设计(创新性、领导力、组织文化、公共报告和患者安全实践、信息技术系统和决策支持、服务活动和规划、劳动力设计、员工培训和教育)。与整体绩效关联最有力的证据是计算机化医生医嘱录入系统。一些证据支持与劳动力设计、使用财务激励措施、护理领导力和医院容量相关联。
有有限的、主要是低质量的证据支持医院特征与医疗绩效之间的关联。需要进一步进行特定特征的系统评价。