Suppr超能文献

在一家一级创伤中心就诊的机动车碰撞事故中未系安全带儿童中,座位位置在确定损伤模式方面的作用。

The role of seating position in determining the injury pattern among unrestrained children involved in motor vehicle collisions presenting to a level I trauma center.

作者信息

Al-Jazaeri Ayman, Zamakhshary Mohammad, Al-Omair Abdulrahma, Al-Haddab Yasser, Al-Jarallah Othman, Al-Qahtani Raied

机构信息

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Ann Saudi Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):502-6. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2012.502.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Seating position in motor vehicle collisions (MVC) plays a major role in determining the injury pattern in mainly restrained children. However, compliance with child seating and restraint laws is still suboptimal. The role of seating position in predicting injury patterns among unrestrained children has not been previously studied.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective review based on the trauma registry of a level I trauma center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data collection was restricted to unrestrained children involved in MVC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 2001 and March 2010, 274 records were identified. Detailed information about the collision, child seating position and the use of restraints was cross-verified using parental phone interviews.

RESULTS

Of the 274 identified records, cross-verification was possible for 89 (32.4%) unrestrained children, 64 boys and 25 girls, with a mean (SD) age of 83 (40) months. Of these children, 41 (46.1%) were front seated (FS), and 48 (53.9%) were back seated (BS). There were higher rates of rollover (52.1% vs 24.4%, P=.02), ejection (41.7% vs 22%, P=.05), and occupant death ratio (14.8 vs 4, P=.04) among BS children. However, the two groups did not differ in pediatric trauma scores, Glascow coma scale score, or age distribution. FS children were more likely to present with isolated head, neck or facial injuries (HNFI) (51.2% vs 25%, P=.01), whereas BS children were more likely to suffer long bone or pelvic fractures (LPF) (60.4% vs 36.6%, P=.025).

CONCLUSION

Injury pattern can vary according to seating position among unrestrained children presenting at trauma centers after MVC. While FS children are more likely to present with HNFI, BS children more often sustain LPF. BS children had similar trauma severity compared with FS children despite the higher-impact nature of their MVCs. While highlighting the value of proper restraints use and seating position, these results can be valuable in the initial assessment of traumatized children involved in MVC.

摘要

背景与目的

在机动车碰撞事故(MVC)中,座位位置在决定主要使用安全带的儿童的损伤模式方面起着重要作用。然而,儿童座椅和约束法律的遵守情况仍不尽人意。此前尚未研究过座位位置在预测未系安全带儿童损伤模式中的作用。

设计与地点

基于沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家一级创伤中心的创伤登记进行回顾性研究。数据收集仅限于参与机动车碰撞事故的未系安全带儿童。

患者与方法

在2001年7月至2010年3月期间,共识别出274条记录。通过对家长的电话访谈交叉核实了有关碰撞、儿童座位位置和安全带使用的详细信息。

结果

在274条识别出的记录中,对89名(32.4%)未系安全带儿童进行了交叉核实,其中64名男孩,25名女孩,平均(标准差)年龄为83(40)个月。在这些儿童中,41名(46.1%)坐在前排(FS),48名(53.9%)坐在后排(BS)。后排儿童的翻车率(52.1%对24.4%,P = 0.02)、被弹出率(41.7%对22%,P = 0.05)和乘员死亡率(14.8对4,P = 0.04)更高。然而,两组在儿童创伤评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分或年龄分布方面没有差异。前排儿童更有可能出现孤立的头部、颈部或面部损伤(HNFI)(51.2%对25%,P = 0.01),而后排儿童更有可能遭受长骨或骨盆骨折(LPF)(60.4%对36.6%,P = 0.025)。

结论

在机动车碰撞事故后到创伤中心就诊的未系安全带儿童中,损伤模式可能因座位位置而异。前排儿童更有可能出现头部、颈部或面部损伤,而后排儿童更常遭受长骨或骨盆骨折。尽管后排儿童发生的机动车碰撞事故冲击力更大,但与前排儿童相比,他们的创伤严重程度相似。这些结果在强调正确使用安全带和座位位置的重要性的同时,对于参与机动车碰撞事故的受伤儿童的初步评估也具有重要价值。

相似文献

3
A comparison of injuries, crashes, and outcomes for pediatric rear occupants in traffic motor vehicle collisions.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Feb;74(2):628-33. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827d606c.
6
Improper Restraint Use in Pediatric Patients Involved in Motor Vehicle Collisions.
J Surg Res. 2022 May;273:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.015. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
8
Children in side-impact motor vehicle crashes: seating positions and injury mechanisms.
J Trauma. 2004 Jun;56(6):1276-85. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000078883.74947.eb.
9
Odds of critical injuries in unrestrained pediatric victims of motor vehicle collision.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Sep;22(9):626-9. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000227867.46439.76.
10
Pediatric Safety Restraint Use in Motor Vehicle Crashes at a Level I Safety-Net Trauma Center.
J Surg Res. 2021 Feb;258:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.053. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of childhood injuries in Saudi Arabia: a scoping review.
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Sep 25;21(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02886-8.
2
Malaysian Child Restraint Issues: A Brief Narrative Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 16;17(6):1922. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061922.
3
Mechanisms, patterns and outcomes of paediatric polytrauma in a UK major trauma centre.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Jan;99(1):39-45. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0222. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
4
Burden of traumatic injuries in Saudi Arabia: lessons from a major trauma registry in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ann Saudi Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):291-6. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2014.291.

本文引用的文献

2
Upper extremity injuries in restrained front-seat occupants after motor vehicle crashes.
J Trauma. 2011 Apr;70(4):838-44. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181df6848.
3
Restraint use and seating position among children less than 13 years of age: Is it still a problem?
J Safety Res. 2010 Apr;41(2):183-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Apr 7.
4
An observational study of seatbelt use among vehicle occupants in Nigeria.
Inj Prev. 2010 Apr;16(2):85-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2009.023242.
5
Front versus rear seat injury risk for child passengers: evaluation of newer model year vehicles.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Jun;10(3):297-301. doi: 10.1080/15389580802677799.
8
Seat belt use among American Indians/Alaska Natives and non-Hispanic whites.
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Sep;33(3):200-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.032.
9
Effect of booster seat laws on appropriate restraint use by children 4 to 7 years old involved in crashes.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Mar;161(3):270-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.3.270.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验