Department of Linguistics University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1543, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1050-60. doi: 10.1121/1.4730893.
To determine if the speaking fundamental frequency (F0) profiles of English and Mandarin differ, a variety of voice samples from male and female speakers were compared. The two languages' F0 profiles were sometimes found to differ, but these differences depended on the particular speech samples being compared. Most notably, the physiological F0 ranges of the speakers, determined from tone sweeps, hardly differed between the two languages, indicating that the English and Mandarin speakers' voices are comparable. Their use of F0 in single-word utterances was, however, quite different, with the Mandarin speakers having higher maximums and means, and larger ranges, even when only the Mandarin high falling tone was compared with English. In contrast, for a prose passage, the two languages were more similar, differing only in the mean F0, Mandarin again being higher. The study thus contributes to the growing literature showing that languages can differ in their F0 profile, but highlights the fact that the choice of speech materials to compare can be critical.
为了确定英语和汉语的基频(F0)分布是否存在差异,对来自不同性别说话者的各种语音样本进行了比较。结果发现,这两种语言的 F0 分布有时存在差异,但这些差异取决于正在比较的特定语音样本。值得注意的是,从声调扫描中确定的两个语言的说话者的生理 F0 范围几乎没有差异,这表明英语和汉语说话者的声音是可以比较的。然而,他们在单个单词发音中的 F0 使用却大不相同,即使仅将汉语的高平调与英语进行比较,汉语说话者的最大值和平均值也更高,范围也更大。相比之下,对于一段散文,这两种语言更为相似,仅在平均 F0 上有所不同,汉语再次更高。因此,该研究有助于不断增加的文献表明,语言在 F0 分布上可能存在差异,但强调了选择要比较的语音材料可能至关重要的事实。