Beeney L J, Dunn S M
Patient Educ Couns. 1990 Dec;16(3):217-29. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(90)90071-r.
Evaluation of diabetes education programs (DEPs) has provided minimal empirical support for a relationship between improved knowledge and better metabolic control. We hypothesized that improved knowledge in specific areas is predictive of changes in specific measures of diabetes control. Patients (n = 558) attending one of five DEPs completed a diabetes knowledge questionnaire at baseline and post-DEP. Glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb) was measured at baseline and at 3 months follow-up. Total diabetes knowledge (DKN) scores increased significantly by 18%, but improvement was uncorrelated with changes in GHb (r = 0.03). Improvement in nine specific content areas failed to predict changes in GHb (all P greater than 0.05) and improvement in knowledge of the causes of hypoglycemia did not predict changes in frequency of hypoglycemia (chi 2 = 1.54; P greater than 0.05). We conclude that neither global nor specific knowledge improvement predicts metabolic control in diabetes and suggest that evaluation of diabetes education should focus more intensively on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes.
糖尿病教育项目(DEPs)的评估对于知识改善与更好的代谢控制之间的关系,提供的实证支持极少。我们假设特定领域知识的改善可预测糖尿病控制特定指标的变化。参加五个糖尿病教育项目之一的患者(n = 558)在基线期和项目结束后完成了一份糖尿病知识问卷。在基线期和随访3个月时测量糖化血红蛋白(GHb)。糖尿病总知识(DKN)得分显著提高了18%,但改善情况与GHb的变化无关(r = 0.03)。九个特定内容领域的知识改善未能预测GHb的变化(所有P均大于0.05),低血糖原因知识的改善也未预测低血糖发生频率的变化(χ2 = 1.54;P大于0.05)。我们得出结论,无论是整体知识还是特定知识的改善均无法预测糖尿病的代谢控制情况,并建议糖尿病教育评估应更集中于行为和态度方面的结果。