Peterková Helena, Císarová Dagmar, Sovová Olga, Holcapek Tomás
Law Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Med Law. 2012 Mar;31(1):1-17.
As the field of medical law is regarded, since the 1950s two most significant entities recognized by international law have been present in the sphere of Europe: The Council of Europe which members signed to protect fundamental rights and freedoms and the European Union established upon the original European Communities which influence protection of fundamental rights steadily tends to grow especially in the last decades and results in a legally binding Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Despite the impressive amount of reservations and exceptions to the conventions, the European Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and particularly the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine are presented as great instruments for influencing national laws. The role of European institutions in coordinating, harmonising or even unifying national laws as far the issue of public health is concerned is much more difficult - on one hand there are the legal binding measures permitted under specific provisions of EU Treaties to define the minimum standard, on the other hand the subsidiary of the Union's action in the area of public health and the doctrine of complementary competence happen to be rather dominant.
就医学法律领域而言,自20世纪50年代以来,欧洲范围内出现了两个国际法认可的最重要实体:其成员国签署了旨在保护基本权利和自由的欧洲委员会,以及在原欧洲共同体基础上建立的欧盟,其对基本权利保护的影响力在过去几十年里尤其是稳步增长,并产生了具有法律约束力的《欧盟基本权利宪章》。尽管各项公约存在大量保留意见和例外情况,但《欧洲保护人权与基本自由公约》,特别是《人权与生物医学公约》被视为影响国家法律的重要工具。就公共卫生问题而言,欧洲机构在协调、统一甚至整合国家法律方面的作用要困难得多——一方面,欧盟条约的具体条款允许采取具有法律约束力的措施来界定最低标准;另一方面,欧盟在公共卫生领域行动的辅助性以及补充性权限原则相当占主导地位。