Department of Human Nutrition, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Mar;45(2):102-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
To determine content, education channels, and motivational factors that influence what health professionals teach about safe food handling to populations who are highly susceptible for foodborne illnesses. To assess the differences in information provided by health professionals to highly susceptible populations.
Descriptive, cross-sectional, Web-based survey.
National convenience sample from across the United States.
Registered nurses (RNs; n = 232) and registered dietitians (RDs; n = 267).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Content, motivation, and education channels used to educate highly susceptible populations.
Various nonparametric tests were applied to measure differences. Significance was declared at P < .05.
Although both RDs and RNs were providing some food safety information to their high-risk clients, RDs had more training than RNs in safe food handling and were more likely to provide comprehensive food safety messages to their highly susceptible clients; however, neither professional type provided consistent food safety information to patients at high risk for foodborne illness.
There is a need for more information about what motivates the health professional to teach safe food handling and a need for a universally adopted, evidence-based practice for teaching safe food handling to patients at high risk for foodborne illness.
确定影响高食源性疾病易感性人群食品安全处理教学内容、教育渠道和激励因素的因素。评估卫生专业人员向高易感人群提供信息的差异。
描述性、跨学科、基于网络的调查。
美国全国便利样本。
注册护士(RN;n=232)和注册营养师(RD;n=267)。
向高易感人群进行教育的内容、动机和教育渠道。
应用了各种非参数检验来测量差异。P<.05 为差异有统计学意义。
尽管 RD 和 RN 都向高风险客户提供了一些食品安全信息,但 RD 在安全食品处理方面的培训多于 RN,并且更有可能向其高风险客户提供全面的食品安全信息;然而,这两种专业类型都没有向食源性疾病高风险患者提供一致的食品安全信息。
需要更多关于激励卫生专业人员教授安全食品处理的信息,以及需要一种普遍采用的、基于证据的实践,向食源性疾病高风险患者教授安全食品处理。