• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导乐人员成为“围产保健集中管理”项目实施者的体验:澳大利亚悉尼的一项试点研究。

Midwives' experiences of becoming CenteringPregnancy facilitators: a pilot study in Sydney, Australia.

机构信息

Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Women Birth. 2013 Mar;26(1):e31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2012.08.002
PMID:22926224
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A pilot study was undertaken between 2006 and 2008 to explore the feasibility of implementing the CenteringPregnancy model of group antenatal care in Australia. The study was undertaken at two hospital antenatal clinics and two community healthcare centres in southern Sydney. This paper reports on one arm of the pilot study, known as the 'Midwives' Study', which aimed to explore the experiences of the midwives as they moved from providing traditional one-to-one antenatal care to facilitating group antenatal care.

METHODS

The Australian pilot study used Action Research. Eight midwives, the group facilitators, and three researchers formed the Action Research group. A qualitative descriptive approach was undertaken to describe the experiences of the midwives. Data were collected using focus groups, surveys and checklists and analysed using thematic content analysis.

FINDINGS

The midwives' initial fears and misgivings about undertaking the new role of group antenatal care gave way to a growing confidence in their abilities and group facilitation skills. They appreciated: the benefits of the CenteringPregnancy model for pregnant women; new opportunities to develop positive relationships with women and their colleagues; and the structured support and education throughout all stages of the Action Research process.

CONCLUSION

The midwives were enthusiastic about their experiences of becoming CenteringPregnancy facilitators and described the benefits of this model of care compared to traditional one-to-one antenatal care. Support and education of the midwives through structured Action Research cycles enhanced the effective implementation of this new model.

摘要

背景

2006 年至 2008 年期间进行了一项试点研究,旨在探索在澳大利亚实施集中妊娠模式的群体产前护理的可行性。该研究在悉尼南部的两家医院产前诊所和两家社区医疗中心进行。本文报告了该试点研究的一个分支,称为“助产士研究”,旨在探讨助产士在从提供传统的一对一产前护理转变为促进群体产前护理时的经验。

方法

澳大利亚的试点研究采用行动研究。八名助产士、小组促进者和三名研究人员组成了行动研究小组。采用定性描述方法来描述助产士的经验。数据收集使用焦点小组、调查和检查表,并使用主题内容分析进行分析。

结果

助产士对承担新的群体产前护理角色的最初恐惧和疑虑逐渐转变为对自己能力和小组促进技能的信心增强。他们赞赏:集中妊娠模式对孕妇的好处;与妇女及其同事建立积极关系的新机会;以及在行动研究过程的所有阶段都有结构化的支持和教育。

结论

助产士对成为集中妊娠促进者的经验感到热情,并描述了这种护理模式与传统一对一产前护理相比的优势。通过结构化的行动研究周期为助产士提供支持和教育,增强了这种新模式的有效实施。

相似文献

1
Midwives' experiences of becoming CenteringPregnancy facilitators: a pilot study in Sydney, Australia.导乐人员成为“围产保健集中管理”项目实施者的体验:澳大利亚悉尼的一项试点研究。
Women Birth. 2013 Mar;26(1):e31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
2
Norwegian nurse-midwives' perspectives on the provision of antenatal diabetes care in an outpatient setting: A qualitative study.挪威助产士对门诊产前糖尿病护理提供情况的看法:一项定性研究。
Women Birth. 2015 Jun;28(2):e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
3
"Who's afraid?": attitudes of midwives to the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for delivery of pregnancy-related health information.“谁害怕?”:助产士对使用信息和通信技术(ICTs)提供与妊娠相关的健康信息的态度。
Women Birth. 2014 Sep;27(3):168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
4
Women's experiences of group antenatal care in Australia--the CenteringPregnancy Pilot Study.澳大利亚妇女群体产前护理体验——“围产期核心小组”试点研究。
Midwifery. 2011 Apr;27(2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
5
A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.审视与恐惧的故事:澳大利亚助产士对外科产科服务审查的经历、参与诉讼及其对临床实践的影响。
Midwifery. 2010 Jun;26(3):268-85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
6
Midwives' perspectives of their ability to promote the oral health of pregnant women in Victoria, Australia.澳大利亚维多利亚州助产士对自身促进孕妇口腔健康能力的看法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 May 7;15:110. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0536-x.
7
Midwives' experiences of routine enquiry for intimate partner violence in pregnancy.助产士对孕期亲密伴侣暴力进行常规询问的经历。
Women Birth. 2016 Dec;29(6):503-510. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 May 10.
8
Midwives' perception of their role in providing antenatal asthma management in Australia--a qualitative study.澳大利亚助产士对其在提供产前哮喘管理中角色的认知——一项定性研究
Midwifery. 2016 Apr;35:11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
9
A qualitative investigation of alcohol use advice during pregnancy: experiences of Dutch midwives, pregnant women and their partners.对孕期饮酒建议的定性研究:荷兰助产士、孕妇及其伴侣的经验。
Midwifery. 2013 Nov;29(11):e89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.11.014. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
10
Midwives' experiences of routine antenatal questioning relating to men's violence against women.助产士关于男性对女性暴力行为的常规产前询问经历。
Midwifery. 2005 Dec;21(4):311-21. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2005.01.002. Epub 2005 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Capital and Cultural Health Capital in Primary Care: The Case of Group Medical Visits.初级保健中的社会资本与文化健康资本:以集体医疗就诊为例。
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Jan;47(1):e13868. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13868.
2
What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature.群体产前护理的作用机制是什么?一项系统的实在论文献综述与综合分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06792-6.
3
Implementing group care in Dutch and Surinamese maternity and child care services: the vital importance of addressing outer context barriers.
在荷兰和苏里南的母婴保健服务中实施群体护理:解决外部环境障碍至关重要。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):527. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06720-8.
4
Exploring the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of group-based pregnancy care and education: a pilot randomised controlled trial in Melbourne, Australia.探索开展基于小组的孕期护理与教育随机对照试验的可行性:澳大利亚墨尔本的一项随机对照试验试点研究
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 May 20;10(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01501-8.
5
A systematic review of providers' experiences of facilitating group antenatal care.系统评价提供者在促进群体产前保健方面的经验。
Reprod Health. 2021 Sep 7;18(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01200-0.
6
Group Prenatal Care in Mexico: perspectives and experiences of health personnel.墨西哥的团体产前保健:卫生人员的观点和经验。
Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Dec 14;54:140. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002175. eCollection 2020.
7
Nurses' and midwives' experiences of providing group antenatal and postnatal care at 18 health centers in Rwanda: A mixed methods study.护士和助产士在卢旺达 18 个卫生中心提供群体产前和产后护理的经验:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 11;14(7):e0219471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219471. eCollection 2019.
8
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
9
The relationship between midwife-led group-based versus conventional antenatal care and mode of birth: a matched cohort study.助产士主导的小组式产前护理与传统产前护理和分娩方式之间的关系:一项配对队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1216-1.
10
The Impact of Introducing Centering Pregnancy in a Community Health Setting: A Qualitative Study of Experiences and Perspectives of Health Center Clinical and Support Staff.在社区卫生环境中引入“以孕妇为中心”模式的影响:对健康中心临床及支持人员经历与观点的定性研究
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Jun;21(6):1327-1335. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2236-1.