Lelong Anne-Sophie, Martelli Nicolas, Bonan Brigitte, Prognon Patrice, Pineau Judith
Pharmacy Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital AP-HP, Paris, FrancePharmacy Department, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Int Wound J. 2014 Jun;11(3):253-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01081.x. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
To conduct a risk analysis of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) care process and to improve the safety of NPWT, a working group of nurses, hospital pharmacists, physicians and hospital managers performed a risk analysis for the process of NPWT care. The failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) method was used for this analysis. Failure modes and their consequences were defined and classified as a function of their criticality to identify priority actions for improvement. By contrast to classical FMECA, the criticality index (CI) of each consequence was calculated by multiplying occurrence, severity and detection scores. We identified 13 failure modes, leading to 20 different consequences. The CI of consequences was initially 712, falling to 357 after corrective measures were implemented. The major improvements proposed included the establishment of 6-monthly training cycles for nurses, physicians and surgeons and the introduction of computerised prescription for NPWT. The FMECA method also made it possible to prioritise actions as a function of the criticality ranking of consequences and was easily understood and used by the working group. This study is, to our knowledge, the first to use the FMECA method to improve the safety of NPWT.
为了对负压伤口治疗(NPWT)护理过程进行风险分析并提高NPWT的安全性,一个由护士、医院药剂师、医生和医院管理人员组成的工作小组对NPWT护理过程进行了风险分析。本分析采用失效模式、影响及危害性分析(FMECA)方法。定义了失效模式及其后果,并根据其关键性进行分类,以确定改进的优先行动。与经典FMECA不同的是,每个后果的关键性指数(CI)通过将发生、严重程度和检测分数相乘来计算。我们识别出13种失效模式,导致20种不同的后果。后果的CI最初为712,实施纠正措施后降至357。提出的主要改进措施包括为护士、医生和外科医生建立每6个月一次的培训周期,以及引入NPWT的计算机化处方。FMECA方法还使根据后果的关键性排名对行动进行优先排序成为可能,并且该工作小组很容易理解和使用。据我们所知,本研究是首次使用FMECA方法来提高NPWT的安全性。