School of Rehabilitation at Fukuoka, International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka,Japan.
Rehabil Psychol. 2012 Aug;57(3):207-13. doi: 10.1037/a0028903.
Although the content of thoughts has received a considerable amount of attention in pain research, the importance of thought processes (metacognitions) has received less attention.
One hundred twenty-nine individuals with muscular dystrophy and chronic pain completed measures assessing metacognitions and frequency of both catastrophizing and pain control beliefs.
Greater use of reappraisal and distraction metacognitions were associated with more perceived control over pain, whereas greater use of worry and punishment metacognitions were associated with more catastrophizing.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The current findings indicate that metacognitions are associated with both pain control beliefs and catastrophizing and therefore may play an important role in the development or maintenance of pain-related cognitive content thought to influence patient functioning. Research is needed to determine whether treatments that encourage changes in both metacognitions and cognitive content are more effective than treatments that focus on cognitive content alone.
尽管思想内容在疼痛研究中受到了相当多的关注,但思维过程(元认知)的重要性却较少受到关注。
129 名患有肌肉萎缩症和慢性疼痛的个体完成了评估元认知以及灾难化和疼痛控制信念频率的测量。
更多地使用再评价和分散注意力的元认知与对疼痛的控制感增强有关,而更多地使用担忧和惩罚元认知与灾难化程度增加有关。
结论/意义:目前的研究结果表明,元认知与疼痛控制信念和灾难化都有关,因此可能在影响患者功能的与疼痛相关的认知内容的发展或维持中发挥重要作用。需要研究是否鼓励元认知和认知内容同时改变的治疗方法比仅关注认知内容的治疗方法更有效。