Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA 94538, USA.
Leuk Lymphoma. 2013 Apr;54(4):743-51. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2012.727415. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
To determine whether reported socioeconomic disparities in survival might be related to treatment, we examined patient and tumor characteristics associated with receipt of rituximab and survival in the National Cancer Institute's Patterns of Care Studies (2003 and 2008) for patients with diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) and follicular (FL) lymphoma. Patients with DLBCL (n = 1192) were less likely to receive rituximab if they were older, black or Asian, lacked private medical insurance, had impaired performance status, had no lactate dehydrogenase measurements or were diagnosed with stage I disease. Patients with FL (n = 476) were less likely to receive rituximab if they were unmarried or non-Hispanic white. Receipt of rituximab did not differ by neighborhood median income. Treatment with rituximab was associated with better survival for patients with DLBCL, but not patients with FL. Lower rituximab use in patients with DLBCL without private insurance suggests that previously identified socioeconomic disparities in survival may, in part, be explained by receipt of rituximab.
为了确定报告的生存方面的社会经济差异是否与治疗有关,我们研究了与 National Cancer Institute 的 Patterns of Care Studies(2003 年和 2008 年)中弥漫性大 B 细胞(DLBCL)和滤泡性(FL)淋巴瘤患者接受利妥昔单抗治疗和生存相关的患者和肿瘤特征。如果 DLBCL 患者年龄较大、为黑种人或亚裔、没有私人医疗保险、表现状态较差、没有乳酸脱氢酶测量值或诊断为 I 期疾病,他们接受利妥昔单抗治疗的可能性较小。如果 FL 患者未婚或非西班牙裔白人,他们接受利妥昔单抗治疗的可能性较小。利妥昔单抗的使用与 DLBCL 患者的生存改善相关,但与 FL 患者无关。无私人保险的 DLBCL 患者利妥昔单抗使用率较低,表明先前确定的生存方面的社会经济差异可能部分归因于利妥昔单抗的使用。