Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale-Davie, FL 33314-7796, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2013 Jan;69(1):100-13. doi: 10.1002/jclp.21912. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
The current study explored differences in acceptance of telehealth interventions amongst currently licensed and future clinicians with a focus on web camera-based intervention. The influence of theoretical orientation was also assessed.
An online survey assessed 717 participants comprising 409 licensed psychologists (40.8% female, mean age = 56.57, standard deviation [SD] = 11.01) and 308 doctoral-level students (78.9% female, mean age = 27.66, SD = 5.9) across domains of endorsement and rejection.
Binary logistic regression indicated no significant difference between currently licensed and future psychologists in their endorsement of telehealth modalities. Cognitive-behavioral, cognitive, behavioral, and systems psychologists were significantly more accepting of telehealth interventions than were dynamic/analytic or existential therapists.
Increasing exposure to telehealth through education as well as continued research on efficacy for specific diagnoses may help psychologists to more effectively determine whether telehealth is the "best fit" for both clinician and client.
本研究探讨了目前持照临床医生和未来临床医生对远程医疗干预措施的接受程度的差异,重点是基于网络摄像头的干预措施。还评估了理论取向的影响。
一项在线调查评估了 717 名参与者,其中包括 409 名持照心理学家(40.8%为女性,平均年龄为 56.57,标准差为 11.01)和 308 名博士水平的学生(78.9%为女性,平均年龄为 27.66,标准差为 5.9),涵盖了认可和拒绝的各个领域。
二进制逻辑回归表明,目前持照和未来心理学家在对远程医疗模式的认可方面没有显著差异。认知行为、认知、行为和系统心理学家比动态/分析或存在主义治疗师更能接受远程医疗干预措施。
通过教育增加对远程医疗的接触,以及对特定诊断的疗效的持续研究,可能有助于心理学家更有效地确定远程医疗是否是临床医生和客户的“最佳选择”。