Fitch R D, Turi M, Bowman B E, Hardaker W T
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
J Pediatr Orthop. 1990 Jan-Feb;10(1):44-7.
An analysis of the efficacy of two techniques of posterior spinal instrumentation in patients with idiopathic scoliosis was performed. Thirty-two consecutive patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation and no external bracing were compared with 30 consecutive patients treated with Harrington rod instrumentation supplemented by Bobechko hooks, sublaminar wires, and postoperative bracing. The groups were similar in age, curve magnitude, and type. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation demonstrated significantly improved immediate frontal plane correction. It was also more effective in improving thoracic kyphosis, particularly in patients with preoperative hypokyphosis. Both procedures were performed with similar operative time, blood loss, and minimal complication rates.
对两种后路脊柱内固定技术治疗特发性脊柱侧凸患者的疗效进行了分析。将32例连续接受Cotrel-Dubousset内固定且未使用外部支具治疗的患者与30例连续接受Harrington棒内固定并辅以Bobechko钩、椎板下钢丝及术后支具治疗的患者进行比较。两组患者在年龄、侧弯度数和类型方面相似。Cotrel-Dubousset内固定在即时额状面矫正方面有显著改善。在改善胸椎后凸方面也更有效,尤其是术前存在后凸不足的患者。两种手术的手术时间、失血量相似,并发症发生率均较低。