Georgia Prevention Center, Institute for Public and Preventive Health, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th St, Ste 1640, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
JAMA. 2012 Sep 19;308(11):1103-12. doi: 10.1001/2012.jama.10762.
Pediatric studies have shown that aerobic exercise reduces metabolic risk, but dose-response information is not available.
To test the effect of different doses of aerobic training on insulin resistance, fatness, visceral fat, and fitness in overweight, sedentary children and to test moderation by sex and race.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled efficacy trial conducted from 2003 through 2007 in which 222 overweight or obese sedentary children (mean age, 9.4 years; 42% male; 58% black) were recruited from 15 public schools in the Augusta, Georgia, area.
Children were randomly assigned to low-dose (20 min/d; n = 71) or high-dose (40 min/d; n = 73) aerobic training (5 d/wk; mean duration, 13 [SD, 1.6] weeks) or a control condition (usual physical activity; n = 78).
The prespecified primary outcomes were postintervention type 2 diabetes risk assessed by insulin area under the curve (AUC) from an oral glucose tolerance test, aerobic fitness (peak oxygen consumption [VO2]), percent body fat via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and visceral fat via magnetic resonance, analyzed by intention to treat.
The study had 94% retention (n = 209). Most children (85%) were obese. At baseline, mean body mass index was 26 (SD, 4.4). Reductions in insulin AUC were larger in the high-dose group (adjusted mean difference, -3.56 [95% CI, -6.26 to -0.85] × 10(3) μU/mL; P = .01) and the low-dose group (adjusted mean difference, -2.96 [95% CI, -5.69 to -0.22] × 10(3) μU/mL; P = .03) than the control group. Dose-response trends were also observed for body fat (adjusted mean difference, -1.4% [95% CI, -2.2% to -0.7%]; P < .001 and -0.8% [95% CI, -1.6% to -0.07%]; P = .03) and visceral fat (adjusted mean difference, -3.9 cm3 [95% CI, -6.0 to -1.7 cm3]; P < .001 and -2.8 cm3 [95% CI, -4.9 to -0.6 cm3]; P = .01) in the high- and low-dose vs control groups, respectively. Effects in the high- and low-dose groups vs control were similar for fitness (adjusted mean difference in peak VO2, 2.4 [95% CI, 0.4-4.5] mL/kg/min; P = .02 and 2.4 [95% CI, 0.3-4.5] mL/kg/min; P = .03, respectively). High- vs low-dose group effects were similar for these outcomes. There was no moderation by sex or race.
In this trial, after 13 weeks, 20 or 40 min/d of aerobic training improved fitness and demonstrated dose-response benefits for insulin resistance and general and visceral adiposity in sedentary overweight or obese children, regardless of sex or race.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00108901.
儿科研究表明,有氧运动可降低代谢风险,但目前尚不清楚其剂量反应信息。
测试不同剂量的有氧运动对超重、久坐儿童胰岛素抵抗、肥胖、内脏脂肪和体能的影响,并测试性别和种族的调节作用。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项 2003 年至 2007 年在佐治亚州奥古斯塔地区的 15 所公立学校进行的随机对照疗效试验,共招募了 222 名超重或肥胖的久坐儿童(平均年龄 9.4 岁;42%为男性;58%为黑人)。
儿童被随机分配到低剂量组(20 分钟/天;n = 71)或高剂量组(40 分钟/天;n = 73)有氧运动(每周 5 天;平均持续时间 13[SD,1.6]周)或对照组(常规体育活动;n = 78)。
主要结局是通过口服葡萄糖耐量试验测定的胰岛素 AUC 评估的 2 型糖尿病风险、有氧健身(峰值耗氧量[VO2])、通过双能 X 射线吸收法测定的体脂肪百分比和通过磁共振成像测定的内脏脂肪,通过意向治疗进行分析。
该研究的保留率为 94%(n = 209)。大多数儿童(85%)肥胖。基线时,平均体重指数为 26(SD,4.4)。高剂量组(调整后平均差异,-3.56[95%CI,-6.26 至-0.85]×103μU/mL;P =.01)和低剂量组(调整后平均差异,-2.96[95%CI,-5.69 至-0.22]×103μU/mL;P =.03)的胰岛素 AUC 降低幅度大于对照组。对于体脂(调整后平均差异,-1.4%[95%CI,-2.2%至-0.7%];P <.001 和-0.8%[95%CI,-1.6%至-0.07%];P =.03)和内脏脂肪(调整后平均差异,-3.9cm3[95%CI,-6.0 至-1.7cm3];P <.001 和-2.8cm3[95%CI,-4.9 至-0.6cm3];P =.01),高剂量组和低剂量组与对照组相比,也存在剂量反应趋势。高剂量组和低剂量组与对照组相比,体能的变化(峰值 VO2 的调整平均差异,2.4[95%CI,0.4-4.5]mL/kg/min;P =.02 和 2.4[95%CI,0.3-4.5]mL/kg/min;P =.03)相似。高剂量组与低剂量组之间的影响也相似。性别或种族无调节作用。
在这项试验中,经过 13 周的 20 或 40 分钟/天的有氧运动训练,提高了久坐超重或肥胖儿童的体能,并表现出对胰岛素抵抗以及总体和内脏肥胖的剂量反应获益,无论性别或种族如何。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00108901。