Suppr超能文献

[反阿是穴超微针刀疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效观察]

[Efficacy observation on osteoarthritis of the knee treated with the ultrastructural acupotomy therapy at the counter-Ashi points].

作者信息

Liu Mei-Rong, Li Li, He Zhi-Wei

机构信息

Department of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of CM, Changsha 410007, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2012 Jul;32(7):621-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the difference in the efficacy on osteoarthritis of the knee between the ultrastructural acupotomy therapy at the counter-Ashi points and the conventional acupuncture-moxibustion therapy.

METHODS

Sixty cases were randomly devided into an ultrastructural acupotomy therapy group (group A) and a conventional acupuncture-moxibustion group (group B), 30 cases in each one. In the group A, the ultrastructural acupotomy therapy was applied to the counter-Ashi points in which pain was alleviated or disappeared on pressure. The treatment was given once a week, lasting for 1 month. In the group B, the acupuncture-moxibustion therapy was applied to Dubi (ST 35), Neixiyan (EX-LE 4), Zusanli (ST 36), Yanglingquan (GB 34), etc. The treatment was given once daily, lasting for 1 month. Before and after treatment, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Lysholm knee joint scale and the affected knee joint flexion angle were observed in the two groups. The clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After treatment, the scores of VAS, Lysholm knee joint scale and the affected knee joint flexion angle were improved obviously as compared with those before treatment in either group (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). The results of them in the group A were superior apparently to those in the group B (all P < 0.05). The total effective rate in the group A was superior to that in the group B [80.0% (24/30) vs 60.0% (18/30), P < 0.05].

CONCLUSION

The ultrastructural acupotomy therapy at the counter-Ashi points achieves the superior clinical efficacy on osteoarthritis of the knee as compared with the conventional acupuncture therapy. It relieves pain and improves the motion range of knee joint effectively. It is simple in operation and less in treatment frequency.

摘要

目的

比较阿是穴反阿是点超微针刀疗法与传统针灸疗法治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效差异。

方法

将60例患者随机分为超微针刀疗法组(A组)和传统针灸组(B组),每组30例。A组采用超微针刀疗法针刺压痛减轻或消失的反阿是点,每周治疗1次,连续治疗1个月。B组针刺犊鼻(ST35)、内膝眼(EX-LE4)、足三里(ST36)、阳陵泉(GB34)等穴位,每日治疗1次,连续治疗1个月。观察两组治疗前后的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Lysholm膝关节评分及患侧膝关节屈曲角度,并比较两组临床疗效。

结果

两组治疗后VAS评分、Lysholm膝关节评分及患侧膝关节屈曲角度均较治疗前明显改善(P<0.01,P<0.05),且A组改善情况明显优于B组(均P<0.05)。A组总有效率高于B组[80.0%(24/30)比60.0%(18/30),P<0.05]。

结论

阿是穴反阿是点超微针刀疗法治疗膝关节骨性关节炎临床疗效优于传统针刺疗法,能有效缓解疼痛,改善膝关节活动度,且操作简单,治疗频次少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验