Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Oct;60(10):1817-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04166.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
To review the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression in older people, together with factors associated with its efficacy.
Online literature databases and registers were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CBT for depression in older people. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted.
Studies involving participants from the community and inpatient and outpatient clinical settings were included in the meta-analysis.
Older people with major or minor depression, dysthymia, or depressive symptoms.
Evidence-based outcome measures of depression.
Four hundred eighty-five studies were identified, of which 23 were included. At the end of the intervention, CBT was significantly more effective at reducing depressive symptoms (irrespective of whether rated by clinicians or participants) than treatment as usual (TAU) or being on a waiting list but not than active controls. The same pattern of results was found for 6-month follow-up. At all other time-points, pooled effect sizes in favor of CBT were nonsignificant. Clinician-rated outcome measures resulted in larger effect sizes in favor of CBT than self-rated measures. No significant differences in efficacy were found between CBT and other treatment (pharmacotherapy and other psychotherapies). Meta-regression analyses revealed four factors that predicted effect sizes for comparisons between CBT and control conditions, including whether concurrent pharmacotherapy was allowed.
CBT for depression in older people is more effective than waiting list or TAU, but greater efficacy than active controls or other treatment has not been demonstrated. More high-quality RCTs comparing CBT with active controls need to be conducted before firm conclusions can be drawn about the efficacy of CBT for depression in older people. Other treatment approaches that could be contrasted with or augment CBT (e.g., pharmacotherapy) also need to be explored further.
综述认知行为疗法(CBT)治疗老年人抑郁症的疗效,以及与疗效相关的因素。
在线文献数据库和登记处检索了 CBT 治疗老年人抑郁症的随机对照试验(RCT)。进行了随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析。
纳入的研究涉及社区和住院及门诊临床环境中的参与者。
患有重度或轻度抑郁症、心境恶劣障碍或抑郁症状的老年人。
基于证据的抑郁结局测量。
共确定了 485 项研究,其中 23 项被纳入荟萃分析。在干预结束时,CBT 在降低抑郁症状方面(无论是由临床医生还是参与者评定)均显著优于常规治疗(TAU)或等待名单,但与活性对照相比则不然。6 个月随访时也出现了同样的结果。在所有其他时间点,CBT 有利于的汇总效应大小均无统计学意义。临床医生评定的结局测量结果得出的 CBT 效应大小大于自我评定的测量结果。CBT 与其他治疗(药物治疗和其他心理治疗)之间的疗效无显著差异。荟萃回归分析显示了四个因素可预测 CBT 与对照条件之间比较的效应大小,包括是否允许同时进行药物治疗。
CBT 治疗老年人抑郁症比等待名单或 TAU 更有效,但尚未证明 CBT 比活性对照或其他治疗更有效。需要进行更多高质量的 RCT 来比较 CBT 与活性对照,才能对 CBT 治疗老年人抑郁症的疗效得出确切结论。还需要进一步探讨可与 CBT 形成对比或增强 CBT 的其他治疗方法(例如药物治疗)。