Mandell and Blau MD's PC, New Britain Connecticut Norwalk Hospital, Norwalk, Connecticut 06052, USA.
Breast J. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):517-22. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12003. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
The aim of this study was to determine the potential of screening breast ultrasound to improve breast cancer detection in women with mammographically normal, but dense breasts. Six Connecticut radiology practices with 12 total sites participated in a retrospective chart review. The total number of screening mammograms, screening ultrasounds broken down by BIRADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) codes, and the number of positive and negative biopsies were collected from November 2009 through November 2010. Demographic data on the patients with positive biopsies as well as cancer staging were also collected. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value were calculated. A total of 72,030 screening mammograms and 8,647 screening ultrasounds were performed at the research sites during the study period. Relevant research indicates that 41% of the female population has dense breasts. In this study, 12% (8,647/72,030) underwent follow-up breast ultrasound screening. A total of 86% (7,451/8,647) of the ultrasounds were BIRADS 1 or 2, 9% (767/8,647) were BIRADS 3, 5% (429/8,647) were BIRADS 4 or 5. Of those 429 recommended to undergo biopsy 418 were performed and 28 cancers were found. There was one false negative. Screening breast ultrasound in women with mammographically normal, but dense breasts has a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 6.7% (28/418), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 99.9% (7,450/7,451), sensitivity of 96.6% (28/29), and a specificity of 94.9% (7,450/7,851). Screening ultrasound had an additional yield of 3.25 per 1,000 cancers in women with dense breasts and normal mammograms and no additional risk factors. As with all screening tests, time, cost, and false positive risk must be considered.
本研究旨在确定乳腺超声筛查在乳腺 X 线摄影检查正常但乳腺致密的女性中提高乳腺癌检出率的潜力。康涅狄格州的 6 家放射科诊所共 12 个分支机构参与了回顾性图表审查。从 2009 年 11 月到 2010 年 11 月,收集了筛查乳房 X 光检查、按乳腺成像报告和数据系统 (BIRADS) 代码细分的筛查超声检查以及阳性和阴性活检的数量。还收集了阳性活检患者的人口统计学数据以及癌症分期。计算了敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。在研究期间,研究地点共进行了 72,030 次筛查乳房 X 光检查和 8,647 次筛查超声检查。相关研究表明,41%的女性人口乳腺致密。在这项研究中,12%(8,647/72,030)接受了后续乳腺超声筛查。总共 86%(7,451/8,647)的超声为 BIRADS 1 或 2,9%(767/8,647)为 BIRADS 3,5%(429/8,647)为 BIRADS 4 或 5。在建议进行活检的 429 例中,418 例进行了活检,发现了 28 例癌症。有 1 例假阴性。在乳腺 X 线摄影检查正常但乳腺致密的女性中进行乳腺超声筛查的阳性预测值 (PPV) 为 6.7%(28/418),阴性预测值 (NPV) 为 99.9%(7,450/7,451),敏感性为 96.6%(28/29),特异性为 94.9%(7,450/7,851)。在乳腺 X 线摄影检查正常且无其他危险因素的乳腺致密女性中,筛查超声检查的额外检出率为每 1000 例癌症增加 3.25 例。与所有筛查试验一样,必须考虑时间、成本和假阳性风险。