Suppr超能文献

比较外科和经导管闭合膜周部室间隔缺损的结果和经济分析。

Comparison of results and economic analysis of surgical and transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Changhai Hospital, 2nd Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Dec;42(6):e157-62. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs519. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The last decade has witnessed considerable improvement in design and implantation techniques for the percutaneous closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects. This study was undertaken to compare the results and economic analysis of traditional surgery and percutaneous closure with a modified double-disk occluder during hospitalization.

METHODS

A total of 345 consecutive patients who underwent isolated perimembranous ventricular septal defect closure were identified between July 2009 and July 2011 in our institution. A total of 157 patients with perimembranous ventricular septal defect (45.5%) underwent percutaneous closure and the remaining 188 patients (54.5%) were treated surgically.

RESULTS

In the percutaneous closure group, 156 patients (99.4%) had immediate complete closure and 186 (98.9%) in the surgical group were treated successfully (P = 0.671). The surgical group was significantly younger (P = 0.000) and larger in size (P = 0.000). One case of irreversible complete atrioventricular block and one death occurred in the surgical group. There was no significant difference in terms of hospital stay between the two groups. The total medical cost in the percutaneous closure group was lower compared with that in the surgical group (P = 0.005). Charges for medication, bed occupancy and nursing care of patients undergoing surgical closure were greater than those for patients undergoing transcatheter closure (P = 0.000, P = 0.000, P = 0.000, respectively). None of the patients in the percutaneous closure group required blood transfusion during hospitalization. Charges for radiography, lab and ultrasound in the percutaneous closure group were higher compared with those in the surgical group (P = 0.000, P = 0.000, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with surgical repair at our institution, the superior clinical outcomes and economic benefits of percutaneous closure are inspiring. Percutaneous closure is a valuable alternative to surgery and allows more patients to be effectively treated in China.

摘要

目的

过去十年见证了经皮膜周部室间隔缺损封堵术设计和植入技术的显著改进。本研究旨在比较传统手术与经皮改良双盘封堵器封堵术的住院期间结果和经济学分析。

方法

2009 年 7 月至 2011 年 7 月,我院共收治 345 例孤立性膜周部室间隔缺损患者。其中 157 例(45.5%)采用经皮封堵,188 例(54.5%)采用手术治疗。

结果

在经皮封堵组中,156 例(99.4%)即刻完全封堵,手术组 186 例(98.9%)成功封堵(P = 0.671)。手术组患者年龄更小(P = 0.000),体型更大(P = 0.000)。手术组发生 1 例不可逆性完全性房室传导阻滞和 1 例死亡。两组患者住院时间无显著差异。经皮封堵组总医疗费用低于手术组(P = 0.005)。手术组患者的药物、床位占用和护理费用高于经皮封堵组(P = 0.000、P = 0.000、P = 0.000)。经皮封堵组患者住院期间无需输血。经皮封堵组的放射学、实验室和超声检查费用高于手术组(P = 0.000、P = 0.000)。

结论

与我院手术修复相比,经皮封堵具有更优的临床效果和经济效益。经皮封堵是手术的一种有价值的替代方法,使更多的患者在中国得到有效治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验