Suppr超能文献

抗癫痫药物治疗的癫痫患者的卒中风险比较。

Comparative stroke risk of antiepileptic drugs in patients with epilepsy.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2013 Jan;54(1):172-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03693.x. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with epilepsy have higher stroke-related morbidity and mortality, leading to the suspicion that the increased stroke events may be associated with antiepileptic drug (AED) exposure. We evaluated the comparative risk of stroke in adult patients with epilepsy receiving phenytoin (PHT), valproic acid (VPA), or carbamazepine (CBZ) to help determine the stroke risk for Asian patients with specific AED exposure.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). The cohort consists of adult patients with epilepsy who were new to PHT, CBZ, or VPA monotherapy and without prior stroke history. Patients were followed for 5 years. The event of interest was a hospitalization or emergency visit due to stroke. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the comparative risk of AEDs. Subanalyses included an evaluation of different subtypes of stroke, the propensity score matched technique, the intention-to-treat approach, and stratification analyses.

KEY FINDINGS

Patients receiving PHT had a significantly higher stroke risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-2.47), followed by VPA (adjusted HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.78-2.07), when compared with CBZ. The results of all subanalyses showed a consistent trend of higher stroke risk with PHT use. In addition, there appeared to be a dose-response relationship between stroke risk and PHT prescriptions.

SIGNIFICANCE

The stroke risk was higher in PHT but not significantly different in VPA as compared to CBZ. Physicians should reconsider using PHT for patients with epilepsy who already have a higher risk of stroke.

摘要

目的

癫痫患者的中风发病率和死亡率较高,这让人怀疑增加的中风事件可能与抗癫痫药物(AED)暴露有关。我们评估了接受苯妥英(PHT)、丙戊酸(VPA)或卡马西平(CBZ)治疗的成年癫痫患者中风的相对风险,以帮助确定具有特定 AED 暴露的亚洲患者的中风风险。

方法

我们使用台湾全民健康保险研究数据库(NHIRD)进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。该队列包括接受 PHT、CBZ 或 VPA 单药治疗且无既往中风史的新诊断为癫痫的成年患者。患者随访 5 年。研究的终点事件是因中风住院或急诊。采用 Cox 比例风险模型来评估 AED 的相对风险。亚组分析包括评估不同类型的中风、倾向评分匹配技术、意向治疗方法和分层分析。

主要发现

与 CBZ 相比,接受 PHT 治疗的患者中风风险显著升高(校正后的风险比 [HR] 1.72;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.20-2.47),其次是 VPA(校正后的 HR 1.27;95% CI 0.78-2.07)。所有亚组分析的结果均显示 PHT 治疗与更高的中风风险相关。此外,PHT 处方与中风风险之间似乎存在剂量反应关系。

意义

与 CBZ 相比,PHT 治疗的中风风险更高,但与 VPA 相比差异无统计学意义。对于已经有更高中风风险的癫痫患者,医生应重新考虑使用 PHT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验