Suppr超能文献

糖尿病患者血运重建评估的未来:多血管病变的最佳治疗(FREEDOM)试验:研究入组时的临床和血管造影特征。

The Future REvascularization Evaluation in patients with Diabetes mellitus: optimal management of Multivessel disease (FREEDOM) trial: clinical and angiographic profile at study entry.

机构信息

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2012 Oct;164(4):591-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.06.012.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal revascularization strategy for diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) remains uncertain for lack of an adequately powered, randomized trial. The FREEDOM trial was designed to compare contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients with MVD against a background of optimal medical therapy.

METHODS

A total of 1,900 diabetic participants with MVD were randomized to PCI or CABG worldwide from April 2005 to March 2010. FREEDOM is a superiority trial with a mean follow-up of 4.37 years (minimum 2 years) and 80% power to detect a 27.0% relative reduction. We present the baseline characteristics of patients screened and randomized, and provide a comparison with other MVD trials involving diabetic patients.

RESULTS

The randomized cohort was 63.1 ± 9.1 years old and 29% female, with a median diabetes duration of 10.2 ± 8.9 years. Most (83%) had 3-vessel disease and on average took 5.5 ± 1.7 vascular medications, with 32% on insulin therapy. Nearly all had hypertension and/or dyslipidemia, and 26% had a prior myocardial infarction. Mean hemoglobin A1c was 7.8 ± 1.7 mg/dL, 29% had low-density lipoprotein <70 mg/dL, and mean systolic blood pressure was 134 ± 20 mm Hg. The mean SYNTAX score was 26.2 with a symmetric distribution. FREEDOM trial participants have baseline characteristics similar to those of contemporary multivessel and diabetes trial cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The FREEDOM trial has successfully recruited a high-risk diabetic MVD cohort. Follow-up efforts include aggressive monitoring to optimize background risk factor control. FREEDOM will contribute significantly to the PCI versus CABG debate in diabetic patients with MVD.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏足够大的、随机对照试验,多血管病变(MVD)的糖尿病患者的最佳血运重建策略仍不确定。FREEDOM 试验旨在比较当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)与药物洗脱支架治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)在接受最佳药物治疗的 MVD 糖尿病患者中的疗效。

方法

2005 年 4 月至 2010 年 3 月,全球共纳入 1900 例 MVD 的糖尿病患者,随机分为 PCI 或 CABG 组。FREEDOM 试验为优效性试验,平均随访 4.37 年(最少 2 年),可检测出 27.0%的相对风险降低,有 80%的把握度。本研究报告了筛选和随机分组患者的基线特征,并与其他涉及糖尿病患者的 MVD 试验进行了比较。

结果

随机分组的患者年龄为 63.1±9.1 岁,29%为女性,糖尿病病程中位数为 10.2±8.9 年。大多数(83%)患者为三支血管病变,平均服用 5.5±1.7 种血管药物,32%的患者使用胰岛素治疗。几乎所有患者均患有高血压和/或血脂异常,26%的患者发生过心肌梗死。平均糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)为 7.8±1.7mg/dL,29%的患者低密度脂蛋白(LDL)<70mg/dL,平均收缩压为 134±20mmHg。平均 SYNTAX 评分 26.2,呈对称分布。FREEDOM 试验患者的基线特征与当代多血管病变和糖尿病试验队列相似。

结论

FREEDOM 试验成功纳入了高危 MVD 糖尿病患者。后续随访工作包括积极监测以优化背景危险因素控制。FREEDOM 试验将为多血管病变糖尿病患者的 PCI 与 CABG 治疗争议提供重要依据。

相似文献

2
Long-Term Survival Following Multivessel Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes: The FREEDOM Follow-On Study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 19;73(6):629-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
3
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
4
Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients with diabetes: implications of the FREEDOM trial.
Clin Ther. 2013 Aug;35(8):1069-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.07.427.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Etiology and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in the second decade of life.
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Mar;41(3):294-298. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01794-7. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
2
Clinical Updates in Coronary Artery Disease: A Comprehensive Review.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 6;13(16):4600. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164600.
4
Medical Therapy for Heart Failure Caused by Ischemic Heart Disease.
Circ Res. 2019 May 24;124(11):1520-1535. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313568.
5
Development of a cardiac-centered frailty ontology.
J Biomed Semantics. 2019 Jan 18;10(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13326-019-0195-3.
6
Long-Term Survival Following Multivessel Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes: The FREEDOM Follow-On Study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 19;73(6):629-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
7
ANMCO/GICR-IACPR/SICI-GISE Consensus Document: the clinical management of chronic ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2017 May;19(Suppl D):D163-D189. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/sux021. Epub 2017 May 2.
9
'FREEDOM' trial: have the interventional cardiologists lost their freedom?
Indian Heart J. 2013 Jan-Feb;65(1):114-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2013.01.002.

本文引用的文献

1
SYNTAX score reproducibility and variability between interventional cardiologists, core laboratory technicians, and quantitative coronary measurements.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Dec 1;4(6):553-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.961862. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
5
Baseline coronary angiographic findings in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial (BARI 2D).
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Mar 1;103(5):632-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.024. Epub 2009 Jan 12.
6
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):961-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
7
Diabetic multivessel disease: stenting vs. coronary artery bypass grafting.
Indian Heart J. 2007 Mar-Apr;59(2 Suppl B):B72-82.
9
Optimal treatment of the diabetic patient with multivessel disease.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008 Jul;10(4):272-84. doi: 10.1007/s11886-008-0045-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验