Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 13;60(20):2092-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.046. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of beta-blockers in congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS).
Beta-blockers are the mainstay in managing LQTS. Studies comparing the efficacy of commonly used beta-blockers are lacking, and clinicians generally assume they are equally effective.
Electrocardiographic and clinical parameters of 382 LQT1/LQT2 patients initiated on propranolol (n = 134), metoprolol (n = 147), and nadolol (n = 101) were analyzed, excluding patients <1 year of age at beta-blocker initiation. Symptoms before therapy and the first breakthrough cardiac events (BCEs) were documented.
Patients (56% female, 27% symptomatic, heart rate 76 ± 16 beats/min, QTc 472 ± 46 ms) were started on beta-blocker therapy at a median age of 14 years (interquartile range: 8 to 32 years). The QTc shortening with propranolol was significantly greater than with other beta-blockers in the total cohort and in the subset with QTc >480 ms. None of the asymptomatic patients had BCEs. Among symptomatic patients (n = 101), 15 had BCEs (all syncopes). The QTc shortening was significantly less pronounced among patients with BCEs. There was a greater risk of BCEs for symptomatic patients initiated on metoprolol compared to users of the other 2 beta-blockers combined, after adjustment for genotype (odds ratio: 3.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 13.1, p = 0.025). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly lower event-free survival for symptomatic patients receiving metoprolol compared to propranolol/nadolol.
Propranolol has a significantly better QTc shortening effect compared to metoprolol and nadolol, especially in patients with prolonged QTc. Propranolol and nadolol are equally effective, whereas symptomatic patients started on metoprolol are at a significantly higher risk for BCEs. Metoprolol should not be used for symptomatic LQT1 and LQT2 patients.
本研究旨在比较β受体阻滞剂在先天性长 QT 综合征(LQTS)中的疗效。
β受体阻滞剂是治疗 LQTS 的主要药物。目前缺乏比较常用β受体阻滞剂疗效的研究,临床医生通常认为它们的疗效相当。
分析了 382 例接受普萘洛尔(n=134)、美托洛尔(n=147)和纳多洛尔(n=101)治疗的 LQT1/LQT2 患者的心电图和临床参数,排除β受体阻滞剂起始治疗时年龄<1 岁的患者。记录治疗前症状和首次突破性心脏事件(BCEs)。
患者(56%为女性,27%有症状,心率 76±16 次/分,QTc 472±46 ms)中位年龄为 14 岁(四分位间距:8 至 32 岁)开始接受β受体阻滞剂治疗。普萘洛尔组的 QTc 缩短明显大于其他β受体阻滞剂组,在 QTc>480 ms 的亚组中也是如此。无症状患者均无 BCEs。在 101 例有症状的患者中,有 15 例发生 BCEs(均为晕厥)。BCE 患者的 QTc 缩短明显较轻。与其他两种β受体阻滞剂相比,美托洛尔治疗的有症状患者发生 BCE 的风险更大,经基因型校正后(比值比:3.95,95%置信区间:1.2 至 13.1,p=0.025)。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,与普萘洛尔/纳多洛尔相比,接受美托洛尔治疗的有症状患者的无事件生存率显著降低。
与美托洛尔和纳多洛尔相比,普萘洛尔对 QTc 的缩短作用明显更好,尤其在 QTc 延长的患者中。普萘洛尔和纳多洛尔疗效相当,而接受美托洛尔治疗的有症状患者发生 BCE 的风险显著增加。美托洛尔不应用于有症状的 LQT1 和 LQT2 患者。