Kozlov Yury, Novogilov Vladimir, Podkamenev Alexey, Weber Irina
Department of Newborn Surgery, Pediatric Hospital, Irkutsk, Russian Federation.
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Feb;23(1):63-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326952. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
In this work, we have described our experience with repair of bowel discontinuity by applying stapled anastomosis. The aim of this study was to compare two basic intestinal anastomotic techniques and to establish the feasibility of the stapled connection of bowel in neonates and infants.
Between August 2009 and December 2011, we have performed 23 cases of hand-sewn anastomosis (group I) and 21 cases of mechanical anastomosis (group II) in children during the first 3 months of life. The standard hand technique was typically fashioned by continuous two-layer absorbable suture. A stapled anastomosis was accomplished using the linear endoscopic stapler with 2.5-mm staples (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States). The two groups were compared for patients' demographics, operative report, and postoperative outcomes.
There were no differences in the preoperative parameters between the two groups regarding age before surgery, and body weight at operation. The "hand" group and "stapler" group had similar mean preoperative age (19.7 vs. 23.2 days; p = 0.096) and average weight (2884.3 vs. 2716.0 g; p = 0.692). The mean operative time for bowel continuity restoration in group I was 77.4 minutes. In contrast, the mean duration of the operation in the group II was 56.4 minutes. The differences between groups were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The mean time of full enteral feeding for patients with mechanical anastomosis was isochronous for patients with standard hand-sewn technique (6.7 vs. 6.7 days; p = 0.926). The statistically identical postoperative hospital stay was registered in patients of both groups (13.3 vs. 14.1 days; p = 0.852). The postoperative course was uneventful in all the patients. All the anastomoses were fully functional at the end of the study.
Efficacy of the stapled anastomosis was confirmed by the shorter time of operation with saving of equal time of full enteral feeding and hospitalization.
在本研究中,我们描述了应用吻合器吻合修复肠管连续性的经验。本研究的目的是比较两种基本的肠道吻合技术,并确定新生儿和婴儿肠管吻合器连接的可行性。
2009年8月至2011年12月期间,我们对出生后前3个月的儿童进行了23例手工缝合吻合术(第一组)和21例机械吻合术(第二组)。标准的手工技术通常采用连续两层可吸收缝线。使用带有2.5毫米吻合钉的线性内镜吻合器(美国俄亥俄州辛辛那提市的爱惜康内镜外科公司)完成吻合器吻合。比较两组患者的人口统计学资料、手术报告和术后结果。
两组术前参数在手术前年龄和手术时体重方面无差异。“手工”组和“吻合器”组术前平均年龄相似(19.7天对23.2天;p = 0.096),平均体重相似(2884.3克对2716.0克;p = 0.692)。第一组恢复肠管连续性的平均手术时间为77.4分钟。相比之下,第二组的平均手术时间为56.4分钟。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。机械吻合患者完全肠内喂养的平均时间与标准手工缝合技术患者同步(6.7天对6.7天;p = 0.926)。两组患者的术后住院时间在统计学上相同(13.3天对14.1天;p = 0.852)。所有患者术后过程均顺利。在研究结束时,所有吻合口均功能完全正常。
吻合器吻合的有效性通过手术时间缩短得到证实,同时节省了相同的完全肠内喂养时间和住院时间。