Centre for Molecular Modelling, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500 607, India.
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Nov 26;52(11):3088-98. doi: 10.1021/ci300385h. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
The binding free energies (ΔG(Bind)) obtained from molecular mechanics with Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) or molecular mechanics with Generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA) calculations using molecular dynamics (MD) trajectories are the most popular procedures to measure the strength of interactions between a ligand and its receptor. Several attempts have been made to correlate the ΔG(Bind) and experimental IC(50) values in order to observe the relationship between binding strength of a ligand (with its receptor) and its inhibitory activity. The duration of MD simulations seems very important for getting acceptable correlation. Here, we are presenting a systematic study to estimate the reasonable MD simulation time for acceptable correlation between ΔG(Bind) and experimental IC(50) values. A comparison between MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA approaches is also presented at various time scales. MD simulations (10 ns) for 14 HIV protease inhibitors have been carried out by using the Amber program. MM-PBSA/GBSA based ΔG(Bind) have been calculated and correlated with experimental IC(50) values at different time scales (0-1 to 0-10 ns). This study clearly demonstrates that the MM-PBSA based ΔG(Bind) (ΔG(Bind)-PB) values provide very good correlation with experimental IC(50) values (quantitative and qualitative) when MD simulation is carried out for a longer time; however, MM-GBSA based ΔG(Bind) (ΔG(Bind)-GB) values show acceptable correlation for shorter time of simulation also. The accuracy of ΔG(Bind)-PB increases and ΔG(Bind)-GB remains almost constant with the increasing time of simulation.
从分子力学与泊松-玻尔兹曼表面积(MM-PBSA)或分子力学与广义 Born 表面积(MM-GBSA)计算中获得的结合自由能(ΔG(Bind))是测量配体与其受体之间相互作用强度的最常用方法。已经进行了多次尝试,将ΔG(Bind)与实验 IC(50)值相关联,以观察配体(与其受体)的结合强度与其抑制活性之间的关系。MD 模拟的持续时间对于获得可接受的相关性似乎非常重要。在这里,我们提出了一项系统研究,以估计合理的 MD 模拟时间,以获得ΔG(Bind)与实验 IC(50)值之间可接受的相关性。还在各种时间尺度上比较了 MM-PBSA 和 MM-GBSA 方法。使用 Amber 程序对 14 种 HIV 蛋白酶抑制剂进行了 10 ns 的 MD 模拟。计算了基于 MM-PBSA/GBSA 的ΔG(Bind),并在不同的时间尺度(0-1 至 0-10 ns)上与实验 IC(50)值相关联。这项研究清楚地表明,当进行更长时间的 MD 模拟时,基于 MM-PBSA 的ΔG(Bind)(ΔG(Bind)-PB)值与实验 IC(50)值(定量和定性)具有非常好的相关性; 然而,基于 MM-GBSA 的ΔG(Bind)(ΔG(Bind)-GB)值在较短的模拟时间也表现出可接受的相关性。随着模拟时间的增加,ΔG(Bind)-PB 的准确性增加,而ΔG(Bind)-GB 几乎保持不变。