Academic Geriatric Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK.
J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(9):769-74. doi: 10.1007/s12603-012-0388-2.
There is increasing interest in physical performance as it relates to both the current and future health of older people. It is often characterised using the Short Physical Performance Battery including assessment of gait speed, chair rises and standing balance. However this battery of tests may not be feasible in all clinical settings and simpler measures may be required. As muscle strength is central to physical performance, we explored whether grip strength could be used as a marker of the Short Physical Performance Battery.
To examine associations between grip strength and components of the Short Physical Performance Battery in older community dwelling men and women.
Grip strength measurement and the Short Physical Performance Battery were completed in 349 men and 280 women aged 63-73 years taking part in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study (HCS). Relationships between grip strength and physical performance (6m timed-up-and-go [TUG], 3m walk, chair rises and standing balance times) were analysed using linear and logistic regression, without and with adjustment for age, anthropometry, lifestyle factors and co-morbidities.
Among men, a kilo increase in grip strength was associated with a 0.07s (second) decrease in 6m TUG, a 0.02s decrease in 3m walk time, and a 1% decrease in chair rises time (p<0.001 for all). Among women, a kilo increase in grip strength was associated with a 0.13s decrease in 6m TUG, a 0.03s decrease in 3m walk time, and a 1% decrease in chair rises time (p<0.001). Higher grip strength was associated with better balance among men (p=0.01) but not women (p=0.57). Adjustment for age, anthropometry, lifestyle and co-morbidities did not alter these results.
Grip strength is a good marker of physical performance in this age group and may be more feasible than completing a short physical performance battery in some clinical settings.
人们对身体机能的兴趣与日俱增,因为它与老年人当前和未来的健康息息相关。身体机能通常采用“简短身体机能测试”进行评估,包括步态速度、椅子起身和站立平衡测试。然而,在所有临床环境中实施该套测试可能并不实际,因此可能需要更简单的测量方法。由于肌肉力量是身体机能的核心,我们探索了握力是否可以作为“简短身体机能测试”的标志物。
探究握力与老年社区居住男性和女性“简短身体机能测试”各组成部分之间的关联。
参与赫特福德郡队列研究(HCS)的 349 名男性和 280 名女性年龄在 63-73 岁之间,他们完成了握力测量和“简短身体机能测试”。使用线性和逻辑回归分析,在不调整和调整年龄、人体测量学、生活方式因素和合并症的情况下,分析握力与身体机能(6m 计时起立行走测试[TUG]、3m 步行、椅子起身和站立平衡时间)之间的关系。
在男性中,握力每增加 1 公斤,6m TUG 时间减少 0.07 秒(s),3m 步行时间减少 0.02s,椅子起身时间减少 1%(p<0.001 )。在女性中,握力每增加 1 公斤,6m TUG 时间减少 0.13s,3m 步行时间减少 0.03s,椅子起身时间减少 1%(p<0.001)。较高的握力与男性的平衡能力更好相关(p=0.01),但与女性无关(p=0.57)。调整年龄、人体测量学、生活方式和合并症并未改变这些结果。
在该年龄组中,握力是身体机能的良好标志物,并且在某些临床环境中可能比完成简短身体机能测试电池更可行。