Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048131. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
An improved individual-based forest ecosystem carbon budget model for China (FORCCHN) was applied to investigate the spatial-temporal dynamics of net primary productivity of different forest types in northeastern China. In this study, the forests of northeastern China were categorized into four ecological types according to their habitats and generic characteristics (evergreen broadleaf forest, deciduous broadleaf forest, evergreen needleleaf forest and deciduous needleleaf forest). The results showed that distribution and change of forest NPP in northeastern China were related to the different forest types. From 1981 to 2002, among the forest types in northeastern China, per unit area NPP and total NPP of deciduous broadleaf forest were the highest, with the values of 729.4 gC/(m(2)•yr) and 106.0 TgC/yr, respectively, followed by mixed broadleaf- needleleaf forest, deciduous needleleaf forest and evergreen needleleaf forest. From 1981 to 2002, per unit area NPP and total NPP of different forest types in northeastern China exhibited significant trends of interannual increase, and rapid increase was found between the 1980s and 1990s. The contribution of the different forest type's NPP to total NPP in northeastern China was clearly different. The greatest was deciduous broadleaf forest, followed by mixed broadleaf- needleleaf forest and deciduous needleleaf forest. The smallest was evergreen needleleaf forest. Spatial difference in NPP between different forest types was remarkable. High NPP values of deciduous needleleaf forest, mixed broadleaf- needleleaf forest and deciduous broadleaf forest were found in the Daxing'anling region, the southeastern of Xiaoxing'anling and Jilin province, and the Changbai Mountain, respectively. However, no regional differences were found for evergreen needleleaf NPP. This study provided not only an estimation NPP of different forest types in northeastern China but also a useful methodology for estimating forest carbon storage at regional and global levels.
应用改进后的基于个体的中国森林生态系统碳预算模型(FORCCHN),研究了中国东北地区不同森林类型的净初级生产力(NPP)的时空动态。本研究根据生境和种属特征,将中国东北地区的森林分为 4 种生态类型(常绿阔叶林、落叶阔叶林、常绿针叶林和落叶针叶林)。结果表明,中国东北地区森林 NPP 的分布和变化与不同的森林类型有关。1981—2002 年,在中国东北地区的森林类型中,单位面积 NPP 和总 NPP 最高的是落叶阔叶林,分别为 729.4 gC/(m²·yr)和 106.0TgC/yr,其次是针阔混交林、落叶针叶林和常绿针叶林。1981—2002 年,中国东北地区不同森林类型的单位面积 NPP 和总 NPP 均呈显著的逐年增加趋势,在 20 世纪 80 年代至 90 年代之间增长迅速。不同森林类型的 NPP 对中国东北地区总 NPP 的贡献明显不同,最大的是落叶阔叶林,其次是针阔混交林和落叶针叶林,最小的是常绿针叶林。不同森林类型 NPP 的空间差异显著。落叶针叶林、针阔混交林和落叶阔叶林的高 NPP 值出现在大兴安岭、小兴安岭东南部和吉林省以及长白山地区,而常绿针叶林的 NPP 则没有表现出明显的区域差异。本研究不仅为中国东北地区不同森林类型的 NPP 提供了一个估计值,而且为在区域和全球范围内估算森林碳储量提供了一种有用的方法。