Miller Ted R, Gibson Rekaya, Zaloshnja Eduard, Blincoe Lawrence J, Kindelberger John, Strashny Alexander, Thomas Andrea, Ho Shiu, Bauer Michael, Sperry Sarah, Peng Justin, Singleton Mike, Smith Tracy J, Zhang Ying
Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration University of Utah University of Maryland Baltimore New York State Department of Health Connecticut Department of Public Health University of Kentucky South Carolina State Budget and Control Board Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services.
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:87-96.
This paper analyzes what portion of US nonfatal crashes are alcohol-involved and how well police and hospitals detect involvement. A capture recapture model estimated alcohol involvement from levels detected by police and hospitals and the extent of detection overlap. We analyzed 550,933 Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System driver records from 2006-2008 police crash report censuses probabilistically linked to hospital inpatient and emergency department (ED) discharge censuses for CT, KY (admissions only), MD, NE, NY, SC, and UT. We computed national estimates from NHTSA's General Estimates System.Nationally an estimated 7.5% of drivers in nonfatal crashes and 12.9% of nonfatal crashes were alcohol-involved. (Crashes often involve multiple drivers but rarely are two alcohol-involved.) Police correctly identified an estimated 32% of alcohol-involved drivers in non-fatal crashes including 48% in injury crashes. Excluding KY, police in the six states reported 47% of alcohol involvement for cases treated in EDs and released and 39% for admitted cases. In contrast, hospitals reported 28% of involvement for ED cases and 51% for admitted cases. Underreporting varied widely between states. Police reported alcohol involvement for 44% of those who hospitals reported were alcohol-involved, while hospitals reported alcohol involvement for 33% of those who police reported were alcohol-involved. Police alcohol reporting completeness rose with police-reported driver injury severity. At least one system reported 62% of alcohol involvement. Police and hospitals need to communicate better about alcohol involvement. Despite the proven effectiveness of brief alcohol intervention, EDs rarely detect, much less intervene with crash-involved drinking drivers. Both police and EDs particularly need to assess alcohol involvement in minor injury better.
本文分析了美国非致命撞车事故中涉及酒精的比例,以及警方和医院对酒精涉入情况的检测能力。一种捕获再捕获模型根据警方和医院检测到的酒精含量水平以及检测重叠程度来估计酒精涉入情况。我们分析了2006年至2008年《撞车事故结果数据评估系统》中550,933条驾驶员记录,这些记录来自警方撞车事故报告普查,并与康涅狄格州、肯塔基州(仅住院情况)、马里兰州、内布拉斯加州、纽约州、南卡罗来纳州和犹他州的医院住院患者和急诊科出院普查进行了概率关联。我们根据美国国家公路交通安全管理局的一般估计系统计算了全国估计数。在全国范围内,估计非致命撞车事故中7.5%的驾驶员以及12.9%的非致命撞车事故涉及酒精。(撞车事故通常涉及多名驾驶员,但很少有两名驾驶员都涉及酒精。)警方正确识别出非致命撞车事故中估计32%的涉酒驾驶员,其中受伤事故中为48%。不包括肯塔基州,六个州的警方报告称,急诊科治疗后出院的病例中47%涉及酒精,住院病例中为39%。相比之下,医院报告急诊科病例中28%涉及酒精,住院病例中为51%。各州的漏报情况差异很大。警方报告称,医院报告涉酒的人员中44%涉酒,而医院报告称,警方报告涉酒的人员中33%涉酒。警方酒精报告的完整性随着警方报告的驾驶员受伤严重程度而提高。至少有一个系统报告了62%的酒精涉入情况。警方和医院需要就酒精涉入情况更好地沟通。尽管简短酒精干预已被证明有效,但急诊科很少检测到,更不用说对涉撞车饮酒驾驶员进行干预了。警方和急诊科尤其需要更好地评估轻伤事故中的酒精涉入情况。