Suppr超能文献

正面碰撞保护评级良好的车辆在双轨间正面碰撞中的碰撞及损伤模式

Impact and injury patterns in between-rails frontal crashes of vehicles with good ratings for frontal crash protection.

作者信息

Morgan Richard M, Cui Chongzhen, Digges Kennerly H, Cao Libo, Kan Cing-Dao Steve

机构信息

George Washington University, USA.

出版信息

Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:255-65.

Abstract

This research investigated (1) what are the key attributes of the between-rail, frontal crash, (2) what are the types of object contacted, and (3) what is the type of resulting trauma. The method was to study with both weighted and in-depth case reviews of NASS-CDS crash data with direct damage between the longitudinal rails in frontal crashes. Individual case selection was limited to belted occupants in between-rail, frontal impacts of good-rated, late-model vehicles equipped with air bags.This paper evaluates the risk of trauma for drivers in cars and LTVs in between-rail, frontal crashes, and suggests the between-rail impact is more dangerous to car drivers. Using weighted data-representing 227,305 tow-away crashes-the resulting trauma to various body regions was analyzed to suggest greatest injury is to the chest, pelvis/thigh/knee/leg, and foot/ankle. This study analyzed the type of object that caused the direct damage between the rails, including small tree or post, large tree or pole, and another vehicle; and found that the struck object was most often another vehicle or a large tree/pole. Both the extent of damage and the occupant compartment intrusion were explored, and suggest that 64% of the serious injuries are associated with increasing intrusion. Individual NASS cases were reviewed to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanical particulars in the between-rail crash.

摘要

本研究调查了

(1)纵梁间正面碰撞的关键属性是什么;(2)碰撞的物体类型有哪些;(3)由此导致的创伤类型是什么。研究方法是对国家汽车抽样系统碰撞数据系统(NASS-CDS)中纵梁间正面碰撞造成直接损坏的事故进行加权和深入案例审查。个体案例选择仅限于配备安全气囊的评级良好的新型车辆纵梁间正面碰撞中的系安全带驾乘人员。本文评估了轿车和轻型货车驾驶员在纵梁间正面碰撞中的创伤风险,并表明纵梁间碰撞对轿车驾驶员更危险。利用代表227305起拖走事故的加权数据,分析了对身体各部位造成的创伤,结果表明胸部、骨盆/大腿/膝盖/腿部以及足部/脚踝受创最为严重。本研究分析了导致纵梁间直接损坏的物体类型,包括小树或柱子、大树或电线杆以及另一辆车;发现被撞物体最常是另一辆车或大树/电线杆。研究了损坏程度和乘员舱侵入情况,结果表明64%的重伤与侵入增加有关。对国家汽车抽样系统的个别案例进行了审查,以更深入地了解纵梁间碰撞的力学细节。

相似文献

2
Rollover injury in vehicles with high-strength-to-weight ratio (SWR) roofs, curtain and side airbags, and other safety improvements.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(7):734-740. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1482489. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
3
IIHS side crash test ratings and occupant death risk in real-world crashes.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Oct;12(5):500-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.585671.
4
Adapting load limiter deployment for frontal crash diversity.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S43-S49. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1702648. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Association Between NCAP Ratings and Real-World Rear Seat Occupant Risk of Injury.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S146-52. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1061664.
6
Census study of real-life near-side crashes with modern side airbag-equipped vehicles in the United States.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 1:S117-24. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1022895.
8
Factors contributing to serious and fatal injuries in belted rear seat occupants in frontal crashes.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup1):S84-S91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1601182.
9
Frontal NCAP performance and field injury over 40 years.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(3):297-312. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2315890. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
10
Real-world injury patterns associated with Hybrid III sternal deflections in frontal crash tests.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(8):807-15. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.766825.

引用本文的文献

1
Influencing factors for delayed diagnosed injuries in multiple trauma patients - introducing the 'Risk for Delayed Diagnoses Score' (RIDD-Score).
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2199-2207. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02571-2. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Missed foot fractures in multiple trauma patients.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Mar 25;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2501-8.
3
On-scene factors that predict severe injury of patients involved in frontal crashes of passenger cars.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Oct;43(5):663-670. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0714-1. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验