Department of Cognitive Neurology, University Hospital Centre, and School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2012 Dec;25(4):201-7. doi: 10.1177/0891988712464821. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) has been used in different clinical settings as a valuable quick bedside test for executive dysfunction. The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical utility of the FAB for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD), subcortical vascular cognitive impairment (scVCI), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD).
Scores of the total FAB test and subtests were compared between consecutive series of 37 patients with AD, 31 patients with scVCI, 13 patients with FTLD, and 29 cognitively healthy individuals.
There was no statistically significant difference in the total FAB scores among the groups of patients with dementia. When comparing subtest scores, patients with FTLD had significantly lower scores on the lexical fluency subtest compared to the patients with AD (P<.001) or scVCI (P<.001); patients with scVCI had significantly lower scores on the motor series subtest compared to patients with FTLD (P=.02) and AD (P=.035) and on conflicting instructions subtest compared to patients with AD (P=.033).
Some FAB subtests might enhance diagnostic accuracy taking into account clinical history and other tests of executive function.
额叶评估测验(FAB)已在不同的临床环境中被用作一种有价值的快速床边测试,用于评估执行功能障碍。本研究旨在评估 FAB 对阿尔茨海默病(AD)、皮质下血管性认知障碍(scVCI)和额颞叶变性(FTLD)的鉴别诊断的临床效用。
比较了连续的 37 例 AD 患者、31 例 scVCI 患者、13 例 FTLD 患者和 29 名认知正常者的总 FAB 测试和子测试评分。
痴呆患者组的总 FAB 评分无统计学差异。当比较子测试评分时,FTLD 患者在词汇流畅性子测试上的得分明显低于 AD(P<.001)或 scVCI(P<.001)患者;scVCI 患者在运动序列子测试上的得分明显低于 FTLD(P=.02)和 AD(P=.035)患者,在矛盾指令子测试上的得分明显低于 AD(P=.033)患者。
考虑到临床病史和其他执行功能测试,一些 FAB 子测试可能会提高诊断准确性。