Babl Franz E, Crellin Dianne, Cheng Joyce, Sullivan Thomas P, O'Sullivan Ronan, Hutchinson Adrian
Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Dec;28(12):1281-96. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182767d66.
Young children frequently undergo diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the emergency department (ED). Although developed and validated for postoperative pain, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain scores have been recommended and used for the assessment of procedural pain as well. We set out to assess if FLACC scores can differentiate pain and distress and establish a hierarchy of FLACC scores experienced during common ED procedures.
Prospective observational study at an urban tertiary children's hospital ED. We aimed to recruit 30 children each aged 6 to 42 months undergoing intravenous cannula (IV) insertion, nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion, metered dose inhaler (MDI) use and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) measurement. Based on videotapes, 2 independent observers assessed pain and distress using FLACC scores during all procedural phases.
A total of 125 patients were recruited and filmed for IV (33), NGT (30), MDI (34), and SpO2 (28). Median FLACC scores were as follows: NGT, 10 (interquartile range [IQR] 8.75-10); IV, 6.5 (IQR, 4.5-9.75); MDI, 6.5 (IQR, 0-9); and SpO(2), 0 (IQR, 0-0.5). The FLACC scores increased during each of the 3 phases, before the procedure, during restraint, and during the procedure. Procedural distress decreased with age except for NGT insertions, which remained very high irrespective of age.
FLACC scores can be high during nonpainful procedures and the during restraint phase of painful procedures. This indicates that FLACC measures a composite of pain and distress in young children. This study identified substantial levels of pain and distress in young children by FLACC during commonly performed ED procedures, with nasogastric tube insertion having very high and intravenous cannulation/venepuncture and MDI having high FLACC scores.
幼儿经常在急诊科接受诊断和治疗程序。尽管面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰度(FLACC)行为疼痛评分是针对术后疼痛开发并验证的,但也已被推荐用于评估程序性疼痛。我们旨在评估FLACC评分是否能够区分疼痛和痛苦,并确定常见急诊科程序中所经历的FLACC评分等级。
在一家城市三级儿童医院急诊科进行前瞻性观察研究。我们的目标是招募30名年龄在6至42个月的儿童,他们将接受静脉插管(IV)、鼻胃管(NGT)插入、定量吸入器(MDI)使用和血氧饱和度(SpO₂)测量。基于录像带,两名独立观察者在所有程序阶段使用FLACC评分评估疼痛和痛苦。
共招募了125名患者并拍摄了IV(33例)、NGT(30例)、MDI(34例)和SpO₂(28例)的操作过程。FLACC评分中位数如下:NGT为10(四分位间距[IQR]8.75 - 10);IV为6.5(IQR,4.5 - 9.75);MDI为6.5(IQR,0 - 9);SpO₂为0(IQR,0 - 0.5)。在操作前、约束期间和操作期间这三个阶段,FLACC评分均有所增加。除了NGT插入外,程序性痛苦随年龄增长而降低,无论年龄大小,NGT插入时的痛苦程度都非常高。
在无痛程序以及痛苦程序的约束阶段,FLACC评分可能会很高。这表明FLACC测量的是幼儿疼痛和痛苦的综合情况。本研究通过FLACC确定了幼儿在常见急诊科程序中存在相当程度的疼痛和痛苦,鼻胃管插入的FLACC评分非常高,静脉插管/静脉穿刺和MDI的FLACC评分较高。