The Cairns Institute, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia.
Qual Health Res. 2013 Feb;23(2):275-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732312467853. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
Researchers working with Aboriginal Australian partners are confronted with an array of historical, social, and political complexities which make it difficult to come to theoretical and methodological decisions. In this article, we describe a culturally safe and respectful framework that maintains the intellectual and theoretical rigor expected of academic research. As an Aboriginal woman and two non-Aboriginal women, we discuss the arguments and some of the challenges of using grounded theory methods in Aboriginal Australian contexts, giving examples from our studies of Aboriginal empowerment processes. We argue that the ethics of care and responsibility embedded in Aboriginal research methodologies fit well with grounded theory studies of Aboriginal social processes. We maintain that theory development grounded in data provides useful insights into the processes for raising the health, well-being, and prosperity of Aboriginal Australians.
与澳大利亚原住民合作的研究人员面临着一系列历史、社会和政治的复杂性,这使得他们难以做出理论和方法上的决策。在本文中,我们描述了一个文化安全和尊重的框架,该框架保持了学术研究所期望的智力和理论严谨性。作为一名土著妇女和两名非土著妇女,我们讨论了在澳大利亚土著背景下使用扎根理论方法的论点和一些挑战,并从我们对土著赋权过程的研究中举例说明。我们认为,关怀和责任伦理观根植于土著研究方法,非常适合对澳大利亚土著社会过程的扎根理论研究。我们坚持认为,基于数据的理论发展为提高澳大利亚土著人民的健康、福祉和繁荣提供了有用的见解。