Suppr超能文献

理解非劣效性试验。

Understanding noninferiority trials.

作者信息

Hahn Seokyung

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Division of Medical Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Pediatr. 2012 Nov;55(11):403-7. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2012.55.11.403. Epub 2012 Nov 23.

Abstract

Noninferiority trials test whether a new experimental treatment is not unacceptably less efficacious than an active control treatment already in use. With continuous improvements in health technologies, standard care, and clinical outcomes, the incremental benefits of newly developed treatments may be only marginal over existing treatments. Sometimes assigning patients to a placebo is unethical. In such circumstances, there has been increasing emphasis on the use of noninferiority trial designs. Noninferiority trials are more complex to design, conduct, and interpret than typical superiority trials. This paper reviews the concept of noninferiority trials and discusses some important issues related to them.

摘要

非劣效性试验旨在检验一种新的实验性治疗方法的疗效是否不会比已在使用的活性对照治疗方法差到不可接受的程度。随着医疗技术、标准护理和临床结果的不断改善,新开发治疗方法的增量效益可能仅比现有治疗方法略高。有时,给患者分配安慰剂是不道德的。在这种情况下,人们越来越重视使用非劣效性试验设计。非劣效性试验在设计、实施和解释方面比典型的优效性试验更为复杂。本文回顾了非劣效性试验的概念,并讨论了与之相关的一些重要问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22ae/3510268/4c121e9abb1b/kjped-55-403-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding noninferiority trials.
Korean J Pediatr. 2012 Nov;55(11):403-7. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2012.55.11.403. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
2
Understanding the Merits and Drawbacks of Noninferiority Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine.
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Sep;37(9):1378-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Noninferiority Clinical Trials: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.
Semin Liver Dis. 2018 May;38(2):97-102. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1655777. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
4
Noninferiority Trial Design: Opportunities and Challenges.
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Nov;47(11):1101-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Non-inferiority Trial Design in Drug Development: A Primer for Cardiovascular Healthcare Professionals.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2020 Jun;20(3):229-238. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00378-w.
8
Rationale for and methods of superiority, noninferiority, or equivalence designs in orthopaedic, controlled trials.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2645-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1773-6. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
9
Good enough: a primer on the analysis and interpretation of noninferiority trials.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jul 4;145(1):62-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-1-200607040-00011.
10
Randomized clinical trial design for assessing noninferiority when superiority is expected.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 1;25(31):5019-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.8711.

引用本文的文献

3
Dynamically adaptive soft metamaterial for wearable human-machine interfaces.
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 19;16(1):2621. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57634-8.
6
Rapid and accurate testing for urinary tract infection: new clothes for the emperor.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2025 Mar 13;38(1):e0012924. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00129-24. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
8
Therapeutic effectiveness of different machines in intense pulsed light treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction.
Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2024 Jun 4;4(4):182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2024.06.002. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Dementia risk prediction in the population: are screening models accurate?
Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 Jun;6(6):318-26. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.54. Epub 2010 May 25.
3
Lessons from and cautions about noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials.
JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1172-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1172.
5
The pros and cons of noninferiority trials.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Aug;17(4):483-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-8206.2003.00162.x.
7
8
Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments. Part 1: ethical and scientific issues.
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Sep 19;133(6):455-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-6-200009190-00014.
9
Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods.
BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):36-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.36.
10
Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research.
N Engl J Med. 1987 Jul 16;317(3):141-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707163170304.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验