School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Rd, Merced, CA 95343, USA.
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Sep;45(3):813-21. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0282-1.
Researchers in the single-case design tradition have debated the size and importance of the observed autocorrelations in those designs. All of the past estimates of the autocorrelation in that literature have taken the observed autocorrelation estimates as the data to be used in the debate. However, estimates of the autocorrelation are subject to great sampling error when the design has a small number of time points, as is typically the situation in single-case designs. Thus, a given observed autocorrelation may greatly over- or underestimate the corresponding population parameter. This article presents Bayesian estimates of the autocorrelation that greatly reduce the role of sampling error, as compared to past estimators. Simpler empirical Bayes estimates are presented first, in order to illustrate the fundamental notions of autocorrelation sampling error and shrinkage, followed by fully Bayesian estimates, and the difference between the two is explained. Scripts to do the analyses are available as supplemental materials. The analyses are illustrated using two examples from the single-case design literature. Bayesian estimation warrants wider use, not only in debates about the size of autocorrelations, but also in statistical methods that require an independent estimate of the autocorrelation to analyze the data.
单案例设计传统的研究人员一直在争论这些设计中观察到的自相关的大小和重要性。过去文献中所有关于自相关的估计都是将观察到的自相关估计作为辩论中使用的数据。然而,当设计只有少数时间点时,自相关的估计会受到很大的抽样误差的影响,这在单案例设计中通常是如此。因此,给定的观察自相关可能会大大高估或低估相应的总体参数。本文提出了贝叶斯自相关估计,与过去的估计相比,大大降低了抽样误差的作用。首先提出了更简单的经验贝叶斯估计,以说明自相关抽样误差和收缩的基本概念,然后是完全贝叶斯估计,并解释了两者之间的差异。用于分析的脚本可作为补充材料提供。使用单案例设计文献中的两个示例来说明分析。贝叶斯估计值得更广泛的使用,不仅在关于自相关大小的争论中,而且在需要独立估计自相关以分析数据的统计方法中。