Department of Cardiac Surgery, Central Hospital Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Central Hospital Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
The bicuspid aorta is thought to have a higher risk of progressive dilation after aortic valve replacement with a subsequently increased risk of adverse aortic events. Our aim was to compare the risk of late aortic events after isolated aortic valve replacement surgery for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis with concomitant mild to moderate dilatation of the proximal aorta.
A total of 325 consecutive patients (60% males; mean age, 59.5 ± 10 years) with aortic valve stenosis and concomitant ascending aortic dilatation of 40 to 50 mm underwent isolated aortic valve replacement from 1995 through 2000. A total of 153 patients (47%) were diagnosed with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (bicuspid aortic valve group), whereas the remaining 172 patients (53%) had tricuspid aortic valve stenosis (tricuspid aortic valve group). Follow-up (3566 patient-years) was 100% complete. Adverse aortic events were defined as the need for proximal aortic surgery or the occurrence of aortic dissection/rupture or sudden death during follow-up.
Overall survival was 78 ± 4% in the bicuspid aortic valve group versus 55 ± 6% in the tricuspid aortic valve group (P = .006) at 15 years postoperatively, but age-adjusted survival was not significantly different between groups (P = .4). A total of 5 patients (3%) in the bicuspid aortic valve group versus 9 patients (5%) in the tricuspid aortic valve group underwent proximal aortic surgery during follow-up. Aortic dissection occurred in 3 patients in the tricuspid aortic valve group and in no bicuspid aortic valve patients. Fifteen-year freedom from adverse aortic events was 93 ± 3% in the bicuspid aortic valve group versus 82 ± 6% in the tricuspid aortic valve group (P = .2).
Patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis with concomitant mild to moderate ascending aortic dilatation are at comparably low risk of adverse aortic events 15 years after isolated aortic valve replacement.
人们认为二叶主动脉瓣在接受主动脉瓣置换术后,其进行性扩张的风险更高,随后发生不良主动脉事件的风险也会增加。我们的目的是比较二叶式与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者在接受单纯主动脉瓣置换术后,发生晚期主动脉不良事件的风险,这些患者同时伴有近端升主动脉的轻度至中度扩张。
1995 年至 2000 年期间,共有 325 例连续患者(60%为男性;平均年龄 59.5±10 岁)接受主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄并伴有升主动脉扩张 40-50mm。共有 153 例患者(47%)被诊断为二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄(二叶式主动脉瓣组),而其余 172 例患者(53%)为三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄(三叶式主动脉瓣组)。随访(3566 患者年)为 100%完整。不良主动脉事件定义为需要进行近端主动脉手术或在随访期间发生主动脉夹层/破裂或猝死。
在术后 15 年时,二叶式主动脉瓣组的总体生存率为 78±4%,三叶式主动脉瓣组为 55±6%(P=0.006),但两组间的年龄调整生存率无显著差异(P=0.4)。在二叶式主动脉瓣组中,共有 5 例(3%)患者在随访期间进行了近端主动脉手术,三叶式主动脉瓣组中有 9 例(5%)患者进行了近端主动脉手术。在三叶式主动脉瓣组中有 3 例患者发生了主动脉夹层,而二叶式主动脉瓣组没有发生。二叶式主动脉瓣组 15 年无不良主动脉事件的生存率为 93±3%,三叶式主动脉瓣组为 82±6%(P=0.2)。
对于伴有轻度至中度升主动脉扩张的二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者,在接受单纯主动脉瓣置换术后 15 年,发生不良主动脉事件的风险相当低。