Suppr超能文献

鉴别区分双相 I 型、双相 II 型和单相障碍的前驱期和疾病过程变量。

Identifying antecedent and illness course variables differentiating bipolar I, bipolar II and unipolar disorders.

机构信息

School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2013 Jun;148(2-3):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.061. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical differentiation of bipolar conditions (and especially bipolar II disorder) from unipolar conditions is not always straightforward. We sought to identify illness antecedents and correlates that may assist their differentiation and complement clinical symptoms.

METHODS

We undertook detailed comparative analyses of comprehensive data obtained from patients diagnosed with a bipolar or unipolar mood disorder.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 138 bipolar (45 bipolar I and 93 bipolar II) and 214 unipolar participants. Univariate analyses identified numerous differentiating variables, while multivariate analyses generated a refined variable list to determine discriminatory capacity. Controlling for all other factors, those with a bipolar (I or II) condition were more likely than the unipolar sub-set to report a family history of bipolar disorder, experiencing bullying at school, to make a suicide/self-harm attempt, and be less likely to be clinically judged as having 'problematic' personality traits. Factors differentiating bipolar II from unipolar sub-sets included the aforementioned variables, as well as higher rates of lifetime heavy drinking and female gender, and briefer depressive episodes in the bipolar II group. Bipolar I and II sub-sets differentiated solely by higher rates of hospitalization in the former group.

LIMITATIONS

Some study variables (e.g., hospitalization) may merely reflect DSM-IV diagnostic criteria or consequences rather than illness antecedents or correlates. Other self-reported variables (e.g., bullying) are subject to memory biases, and may reflect higher-order variables (e.g., early problematic personality traits).

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings provide assistance to determining non-symptom features that may improve discrimination of the bipolar disorders from themselves and from unipolar conditions.

摘要

背景

双相情感障碍(尤其是双相 II 型障碍)与单相情感障碍的临床鉴别并不总是那么简单。我们试图确定可能有助于区分它们并补充临床症状的疾病前驱因素和相关因素。

方法

我们对诊断为双相或单相心境障碍的患者的综合数据进行了详细的比较分析。

结果

样本包括 138 名双相(45 名双相 I 型和 93 名双相 II 型)和 214 名单相参与者。单变量分析确定了许多有区别的变量,而多变量分析则生成了一个更精炼的变量列表来确定区分能力。在控制所有其他因素的情况下,那些患有双相(I 型或 II 型)障碍的人比单相亚组更有可能报告有双相障碍家族史、在学校遭受欺凌、有自杀/自残的企图,且不太可能被临床判断为具有“有问题”的人格特质。区分双相 II 型和单相亚组的因素包括上述变量,以及双相 II 型组更高的终生重度饮酒率和女性性别,以及双相 II 型组的抑郁发作更短暂。双相 I 型和 II 型亚组仅通过前者组更高的住院率来区分。

局限性

一些研究变量(例如住院治疗)可能仅反映 DSM-IV 诊断标准或后果,而不是疾病前驱因素或相关因素。其他自我报告的变量(例如欺凌)可能受到记忆偏差的影响,并且可能反映出更高阶的变量(例如早期有问题的人格特质)。

结论

研究结果为确定可能有助于从单相情感障碍和自身区分双相情感障碍的非症状特征提供了帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验