Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Sep;8(5):e125-34. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000511. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Causes of racial disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening may extend beyond individual-level characteristics. We examined how physician density, beyond socioeconomic factors, affected observed racial disadvantages in recent CRC screening for blacks and Hispanics.
We obtained socioeconomic and CRC screening information on adults age ≥ 50 years from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (1997 to 2008) and information on the number of primary care physicians and gastroenterologists from the American Medical Association Masterfile (1997 to 2008). We used fixed-effect multivariate logistic regression to model the probability of receiving a fecal occult blood test within the past year or endoscopic screening within the past 5 years as a function of individual-level socioeconomic factors and state-level physician supply.
In 2008, 60.6% of whites were current on CRC screening (95% CI, 60.6% to 61.0%) compared with 57.9% of blacks (95% CI, 56.7% to 59.2%) and 42.9% of Hispanics (95% CI, 41.0% to 44.8%). Inclusion of socioeconomic variables reversed black-white disparities (odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.19) but did not explain disadvantage for Hispanics (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.92). Once interaction of race and physician supply was considered, likelihood of recent CRC screening became statistically indistinguishable for Hispanics and whites of similar socioeconomic status residing in states with high physician supplies.
Socioeconomic factors and physician supply are key predictors of CRC screening. Adjustment for socioeconomic determinants explained black-white disparities; further adjustment for physician supply explained Hispanic-white disparities. Physician distribution is a potentially remediable contributor to ethnic/racial disparities in CRC screening. Whether the United States is able to equitably meet future demand for screening may depend on access, physician supply, and organization of the health care system.
结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的种族差异的原因可能超出个体层面的特征。我们研究了医生密度(超出社会经济因素)如何影响最近对黑人和西班牙裔 CRC 筛查的观察到的种族劣势。
我们从行为风险因素监测系统(1997 年至 2008 年)获得了年龄≥50 岁成年人的社会经济和 CRC 筛查信息,并从美国医学协会大师档案(1997 年至 2008 年)获得了初级保健医生和胃肠病学家人数的信息。我们使用固定效应多变量逻辑回归来模拟在过去一年中接受粪便潜血试验或在过去 5 年内接受内镜筛查的概率作为个体社会经济因素和州级医生供应的函数。
2008 年,60.6%的白人进行了结直肠癌筛查(95%CI,60.6%至 61.0%),而黑人的比例为 57.9%(95%CI,56.7%至 59.2%),西班牙裔的比例为 42.9%(95%CI,41.0%至 44.8%)。纳入社会经济变量逆转了黑人和白人之间的差距(优势比[OR],1.17;95%CI,1.15 至 1.19),但不能解释西班牙裔的劣势(OR,0.89;95%CI,0.87 至 0.92)。一旦考虑到种族和医生供应的相互作用,在医生供应较高的州,具有相似社会经济地位的西班牙裔和白人最近进行 CRC 筛查的可能性在统计学上变得难以区分。
社会经济因素和医生供应是 CRC 筛查的关键预测因素。调整社会经济决定因素解释了黑人和白人之间的差距;进一步调整医生供应解释了西班牙裔和白人之间的差距。医生分布是 CRC 筛查中种族/民族差异的一个潜在可纠正的因素。美国是否能够公平地满足未来对筛查的需求可能取决于获得途径、医生供应以及医疗保健系统的组织。