a Innlandet Hospital Trust Lillehammer, Division Mental Health Care , Lillehammer , Norway.
Child Neuropsychol. 2014 Mar;20(2):162-81. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2012.753998. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
The aim of the study was to compare executive processes with pronounced (hot) and less pronounced (cold) emotional salience in medication naïve children and adolescents with ADHD-combined (ADHD-C) and ADHD-inattentive (ADHD-I) subtypes. Thirty-six subjects with ADHD-C, 44 with ADHD-I, and 50 healthy controls between 8 and 17 years were assessed with laboratory tests and inventory-based scales assessing hot and cold executive functions (EF) (controlled attention, working memory, planning, cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency, hot decision making) and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). The ADHD-C group displayed significantly more impairment compared to the ADHD-I group on the cold BRIEF Inhibition and Monitor scales. There were no significant differences between ADHD subtypes on cold and hot laboratory tests. The hot decision-making task did not correlate with the other cold or hot EF measures. Overall, few EF measures were shown to differentiate between ADHD subtypes nor were there any relationships between the hot decision-making task and the other EF measures, which seems to indicate separate developmental trajectories.
本研究旨在比较具有明显(热)和不明显(冷)情绪显著性的执行过程,在未经药物治疗的 ADHD 混合(ADHD-C)和 ADHD 注意力不集中(ADHD-I)亚型的儿童和青少年中。对 36 名 ADHD-C 患者、44 名 ADHD-I 患者和 50 名 8 至 17 岁的健康对照组进行了实验室测试和基于问卷的量表评估,评估热和冷执行功能(EF)(注意力控制、工作记忆、计划、认知灵活性、言语流畅性、热决策)和行为评定量表执行功能(BRIEF)。与 ADHD-I 组相比,ADHD-C 组在冷 BRIEF 抑制和监测量表上表现出明显更多的损害。在冷和热实验室测试中,ADHD 亚型之间没有显著差异。热决策任务与其他冷或热 EF 测量没有相关性。总体而言,很少有 EF 测量能够区分 ADHD 亚型,也没有热决策任务与其他 EF 测量之间的关系,这似乎表明存在不同的发展轨迹。